Article

The Competitive Strategy of the United States Towards China From the Perspective of Moral Realism: A Case Study of China-U.S. Competition Under the Biden Administration

Xueming Li^1,*, Xinyu Wang²

¹School of Politics And International Studies, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China

² School of Politics And International Studies, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China

^*Correspondence: Xueming Li, E-mail: romminglxm@163.com

Received: 2025-04-03Revised: 2025-04-19Accepted: 2025-04-22Published: 2025-05-30

J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2025, 2(3), 71-85; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250494

Abstract:

Abstract: This paper employs moral realism to investigate the underlying causes of competitive China-U.S. relations, aiming to enhance comprehension and management of global power transition phenomena under contemporary China-U.S. rivalry. As the world’s most consequential bilateral relationship, the evolving dynamics between China [...] Read More.

Keywords: Moral Realism, China-U.S. Relations, Biden Administration, Strategic Competition

Keywords: Moral Realism, China-U.S. Relations, Biden Administration, Strategic Competition

Abstract

Abstract

This paper employs moral realism to investigate the underlying causes of competitive China-U.S. relations, aiming to enhance comprehension and management of global power transition phenomena under contemporary China-U.S. rivalry. As the world’s most consequential bilateral relationship, the evolving dynamics between China and the United States critically shape international patterns, warranting substantial scholarly attention. Building upon the core tenets and analytical framework of moral realism, this paper integrates empirical evidence and policy practices from the Biden administration to conduct a causal analysis of US competitive strategies towards China through dual lenses: comprehensive national power and political leadership capabilities. The findings reveal two primary determinants: First, the relative decline in US comprehensive national power directly motivates the Biden administration's continuation of competitive policies. This manifests through insufficient regional military influence, decelerating economic growth with diminishing capacity to sustain global economic development, coercive promotion of cultural hegemony, and waning political leadership in global governance. Second, the administration’s pronounced political gaming capabilities significantly contribute to its competitive strategic orientation, characterized by Biden’s “Artist” personal attributes and the dominant state’s embodiment of “Proactive Leadership” traits. Current developments indicate a worrying metamorphosis of China-U.S. competition into irrational and adversarial interactions. In response, China should proactively assume major power responsibilities by strengthening political leadership, maintaining strategic composure against US maximum pressure tactics, and safeguarding national interests through the principle of “fostering unity through constructive struggle”. This approach provides China’s distinctive solution for advancing global peace and development in the new era, while navigating the complexities of power transition dynamics.

Keywords: Moral Realism, China-U.S. Relations, Biden Administration, Strategic Competition

Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

Funding

None.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest:

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

References

The White House. The Biden-Harris Administration’s National Security Strategy. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf
Huang, Z. and Han, Z. (2023). “One Body and Four Wings”: An Analysis of the Biden Administration’s “Out-Competing” China Strategy. International Review, (03): 110-134.
Shambaugh, D. (Ed.). (2012). Tangled Titans: The United States and China. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Kennedy, P. (2010). The rise and fall of the great powers: economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. Vintage.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2003). The tragedy of great power politics (Updated edition). WW Norton & Company.
Zhang, F. (2012). The Tsinghua approach and the inception of Chinese theories of international relations. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 5(1): 73-102.
Xuetong, Y. (2015). SHIJIE QUANLI DE ZHUANYI：ZHENGZHI LINGDAO YU ZHANLE JINGZHENG. Peking University Press.
Yan, X. (2014). An International Relations Theory of Moral Realism. China International Studies. (05):102-128+130.
Xuetong, Y. (2013). Ancient Chinese thought, modern Chinese power. Princeton University Press.
Liu, Y. and Yang X. (2019). The Competitive Bilateral Relationship between China and the United States from the Perspective of Moral Realism. Journal of Liaocheng University (Social Sciences Edition). (06): 42-49.
U.S. Department of Defense. 2022 National Defense Strategy. https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.pdf
Xuetong, Y. and Xuefeng S. (2005). The Rise of China and Its Strategy. Peking University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (2003). The decline of American power: The US in a chaotic world. New Press, The.
SPUTNIK. China's growing military power and its lead in many areas have caused concern for the Pentagon. https://sputniknews.cn/20241220/1063286674.html
Liu, Y. (2022). The biden administration’s China policy “changed” and “unchanged”——compared to the Trump administration. Master diss. Jilin University.
Zhao, M. (2023). Three Key Characteristics of the Biden Administration's Diplomatic Strategy. Briefing on Area and Country Studies of Beijing Language and Culture University. (19)
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1997). The fourth turning: What the cycles of history tell us about America's next rendezvous with destiny. Crown.
Chen S. and Zhang X. (2023). Is Biden Old Enough to Make Great Progress?:Judging the Trend of U.S. Policy toward China from the Composite Perspective of American Social Cycle and Generation Cycle. Fudan American Review, (01):137-162.
Brookings. President Biden’s generation: Silent no more. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2021/07/08/president-bidensgeneration-silentno-more/.
Financial Times. Biden Warns China Will Face “Extreme Competition” from US. https://www.ft.com/content/c23a4e67-2052-4d2f-a844-e5c72a7de214
Xuetong, Y. (2019). Leadership and the rise of great powers (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.