Article

Narratives of the South China Sea Under the Marcos Administration in the Philippines: Characteristics, Trends, and Impacts

Kaicheng Lin¹, Jingrong Liu², Ming Tsun Chau³, Hailong Ju^4,*

¹Department of Social Sciences, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

²School of International Studies / Academy of Overseas Chinese Studies, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

³School of International Studies / Academy of Overseas Chinese Studies, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

⁴ School of International Studies / Academy of Overseas Chinese Studies, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

^*Correspondence: Hailong Ju, E-mail: h.jhl.jinan@gmail.com

Received: 2024-08-07Revised: 2024-08-11Accepted: 2024-08-13Published: 2024-09-30

J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2024, 1(5), 41-60; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240299

Abstract:

Abstract: Since his inauguration, Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos has actively aligned with the anti-China coalition led by the US and the West, frequently provoking China and shaping a new narrative about the South China Sea. This paper, based on the overall national security perspective, deduces the Marcos administration's four-dimensional South China Sea [...] Read More.

Keywords: Philippines, South China Sea Narrative, Coast Guard, Ideological Security, Public Opinion Dissemination

Keywords: Philippines, South China Sea Narrative, Coast Guard, Ideological Security, Public Opinion Dissemination

Abstract

Abstract

Since his inauguration, Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos has actively aligned with the anti-China coalition led by the US and the West, frequently provoking China and shaping a new narrative about the South China Sea. This paper, based on the overall national security perspective, deduces the Marcos administration's four-dimensional South China Sea discourse system—sovereignty, international law, history, human rights, and democracy—from Philippine news media reports. It analyzes its dissemination effectiveness in the Anglo-American public discourse arena and explores the establishment of a policy effect assessment system for the Philippines' South China Sea narrative, providing scholarly suggestions for safeguarding against risks to China's ideological security. Employing both quantitative and qualitative big data analysis, this study analyzes South China Sea reports from mainstream Philippine and British/American media from June 30, 2022, to May 31, 2024, examining the content, characteristics, metaphors, and dissemination effects of the Philippine narrative. The research shows that the Philippine South China Sea narrative focuses on territorial sovereignty, international law and history, human rights, and democracy, with the Coast Guard playing a crucial role. The Philippines strengthens its tough stance against China through public opinion, justifies its actions through international law and historical self-validation, maligns China's image through human rights issues, and links democratic values with the South China Sea issue to garner support from Western countries. The study finds that the Marcos administration, through strategic narrative techniques and ideological demarcation, has worsened China's diplomatic strategic environment around the South China Sea, making the public opinion battle over this issue a primary line of conflict in the Sino-Philippine international cognitive space. Hardline stances against China are increasingly mainstream within Philippine society, squeezing the space for positive perceptions of China. This paper recommends that China promptly respond to provocative misinformation, guard against Western propaganda systems meddling in the South China Sea situation, expand the volume of benign perceptions, construct a peaceful diplomatic discourse system, and safeguard ideological security in foreign-related fields.

Keywords: Philippines, South China Sea Narrative, Coast Guard, Ideological Security, Public Opinion Dissemination

Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

Funding

This paper is one of the outcomes of a major project funded by the National Social Science Fund (21&ZD244).

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest:

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

References

Jin, Y., & Cui, T. (2022). On the changing characteristics and result evaluation of U.S. South China Sea policy. Journal of South Sea Studies, (2), 101-114.
Yu, W. (2021). Decision preferences and the South China Sea disputes: A comparative analysis based on psychological ownership theory. Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific, (4), 97-129, 158-159.
Luo, X. (2023). Southeast Asian claimants' "Gray Zone" tactics on the South China Sea dispute: A comparative analysis of Vietnam and the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, (5), 49-70, 154-155.
Cheng, W., Situ, L., Zheng, D., Wang, Y., & Shi, J. (2023). Automatic extraction method of event elements for the South China Sea narrative. Journal of Information Science, 41(3), 155-163.
He, X. (2022). The Biden administration's South China Sea policies: Narrative, implications, and action. Journal of South Sea Studies, (2), 115-132.
Nie, W. (2022). Strategic choice of Southeast Asia under China-US competition structure and the new challenges of the Philippines-US alliance. Journal of South Sea Studies, (3), 130-142.
Ye, S., & Yu, H. (2020). Philippine South China Sea discourse: Motivation, persuasion, and deconstruction. Journal of Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Studies, (2), 110-124, 4.
Ye, S., Yi, Y., & Wang, N. (2019). How Philippine media construct Philippines discourse legitimacy on the South China Sea issue: Based on Gamson's approach of "interpretive packages." Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 51(6), 120-128, 178-179.
"INDOPACIFIC STRATEGY OF THE UNITED STATES,"February 11,2022, available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf/,2024.3.25.
"National Security Policy 2023-2028,"August,2022,available at: https://nsc.gov.ph/images/NSS_NSP/National_Security_Policy_Manual_FINAL_E-COPY_with_WATERMARK_140823.pdf/,2024.6.10.