Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Open Access
Research Articles

The ICRC’s Approach to Multilateralism and Global Governance


Jiawen Li1,*

School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York, the United States & School of International Organizations, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China
Correspondence: Jiawen Li, E-mail: lijiawen@bfsu.edu.cn
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2024, 1(5), 92-109; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240302
Received : 25 Aug 2024 / Revised : 25 Aug 2024 / Accepted : 27 Aug 2024 / Published : 30 Sep 2024
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
This paper explores the International Committee of the Red Cross’s (ICRC) strategic engagement in multilateralism and global governance, particularly in the context of international humanitarian law (IHL). A neutral, impartial, and independent humanitarian organization, the ICRC plays a crucial role in shaping global governance by influencing international norms, collaborating with state and non-state actors, and responding to humanitarian crises. The paper analyzes the ICRC’s approach through the lenses of liberalism, constructivism, and realism, assessing its effectiveness in promoting humanitarian principles, navigating geopolitical challenges, and maintaining its mandate of neutrality. By examining case studies such as the Syrian conflict and the global migration crisis, the paper highlights the ICRC’s strengths in negotiating access, protecting civilians, and fostering compliance with IHL, while also addressing the limitations posed by resource constraints and the complexities of global politics. The study concludes that the ICRC’s contributions to multilateralism are indispensable in fostering global peace, stability, and the protection of human dignity.
Keywords: ICRC, Multilateralism, Global Governance, International Humanitarian Law, Neutrality, Humanitarian Principles, Global Peace Building
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Slim, Hugo (1998). International Humanitarianism’s Engagement with Civil War in the 1990s: A Glance at Evolving Practice and Theory. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance.
  2. Bugnion, François (2003). The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims. International Committee of the Red Cross.
  3. Harroff-Tavel, Marion (2011). The Humanitarian Diplomacy of the International Committee of the Red Cross. International Review of the Red Cross, 93(884), 1195-1221.
  4. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little, Brown and Company.
  5. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553.
  6. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.
  7. Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Forsythe, D. P. (2005). The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Alfred A. Knopf.
  10. ICRC. (2023). Joint call by the United Nations Secretary-General and the President of the International Committee of the Red Cross for States to establish new prohibitions and restrictions on Autonomous Weapon Systems. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/document/joint-call-un-and-icrc-establish-prohibitions-and-restrictions-autonomous-weapons-systems.
  11. UNHCR. International Committee of the Red Cross. Retrieved from https://www.unhcr.org/about-unhcr/our-partners/un-and-international-institutions/international-organizations-0#:~:text=UNHCR%20and%20the%20ICRC%20maintain%20a%20structured%20dialogue,training%20on%20international%20humanitarian%20law%20and%20refugee%20law.
  12. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2023). JOINT AU-ICRC-OCHA SEMINAR ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (IHL) “PRESERVING HUMANITARIAN SPACE UNDER IHL”. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/document/joint-au-icrc-ocha-seminar-international-humanitarian-law-ihl-preserving-humanitarian-space.
  13. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2016). World Humanitarian Summit: Istanbul and beyond. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/document/world-humanitarian-summit-istanbul-and-beyond.
  14. Kuster, E. (2018). Promoting the teaching of IHL in universities: Overview, successes, and challenges of the ICRC’s approach. Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 9(1-2), 61-93.
  15. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2022). ICRC in Yemen: 60 years of impartial and independent humanitarian assistance in Yemen. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-yemen-60-years-impartial-and-independent-humanitarian-assistance-yemen.
  16. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2016). Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/document/fundamental-principles-red-cross-and-red-crescent.
  17. International Committee of the Red Cross. (1977). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Article 1. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/apii-1977/article-1.
  18. International Committee of the Red Cross. (1949). Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention), Article 3. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gc iv-1949/article-3.
  19. International Committee of the Red Cross. (1949). Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention). Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949.
  20. International Committee of the Red Cross. (1949). Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention), Article 18. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/article-18.​​​​​​​
  21. Physicians for Human Rights (PHR). (2020). Anatomy of a Crisis: A Map of Attacks on Health Care in Syria. Retrieved from https://phr.org/issues/health-under-attack/anatomy-of-a-crisis-a-map-of-attacks-on-health-care-in-syria/.
  22. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2020, June 12). Health Care in Danger: Violent Incidents Affecting the Delivery of Health Care, January 2012 to December 2014. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/4237-health-care-danger-violent-incidents-affecting-delivery-health-care-january-2012.
  23. International Committee of the Red Cross. (n.d.). Syria: ICRC in Action. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/where-we-work/syria.
  24. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (1951). Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, Article 33. Retrieved from https://www.unhcr.org/about-unhcr/overview/1951-refugee-convention.
  25. International Committee of the Red Cross. (1949). Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention), Article 26. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/article-26.
  26. International Committee of the Red Cross. (1977). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), Article 32. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-32.
  27. International Committee of the Red Cross. (n.d.). Climate and Conflict. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/law-and-policy/climate-and-conflict.
  28. International Committee of the Red Cross. (n.d.). Article 54: Protection of objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population [Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977]. ICRC. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-54.
  29. International Committee of the Red Cross. (n.d.). Article 55: Protection of the natural environment [Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977]. ICRC. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-55.
  30. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2022). Sophisticated cyber attack targets Red Cross Red Crescent data of 500,000 people. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/document/sophisticated-cyber-attack-targets-red-cross-red-crescent-data-500000-people.

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Li, J. The ICRC’s Approach to Multilateralism and Global Governance. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2024, 1 (5), 92-109. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240302.

Subscribe Your Manuscript