Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Open Access
Research Articles

Interpretation of the PIRLS Assessment Framework and Exploration of Reading Instructional Strategies Under the PIRLS Philosophy


Yingning Wang1,*

Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
Correspondence: Yingning Wang, E-mail: 1581223780@qq.com
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2024, 1(5), 165-176; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240308
Received : 30 Aug 2024 / Revised : 30 Aug 2024 / Accepted : 01 Sep 2024 / Published : 30 Sep 2024
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
The PIRLS assessment framework is a crucial indicator in the PIRLS assessment system, playing a key function in gauging the development and improvement of students’ reading abilities in numerous nations. This paper will certainly disclose the academic keystones of PIRLS, including the meaning of reading literacy, 2 kinds of reading purposes and 4 processes of reading comprehension. Through an in-depth analysis of a series of good teaching practices, it will explore what reading instructional strategies teachers can use under the PIRLS concept into practice, including returning the right to ask questions to students, structuring the handling of reading instruction, enriching reading courses, encouraging students to enjoy and delve into reading, in order to stimulate students to read actively and think critically so as to enhance their reading literacy.
 
Keywords: BPIRLS, Reading Instructional Strategies
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. [Eds]. PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks,2019.
  2. Khoudi Z, Nachaoui M, Lyaqini S. Identifying the contextual factors related to the reading performance of Moroccan fourth-grade students from a Machine Learning-based Approach[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2023: 1-27.
  3. Marôco J. What makes a good reader? Worldwide insights from PIRLS 2016[J]. Reading and Writing, 2021, 34(1): 231-272.
  4. Shiel G, Eivers E. International comparisons of reading literacy: What can they tell us? [J]. Cambridge journal of education, 2009, 39(3): 345-360.
  5. Lopes J, Oliveira C, Costa P. School and student determinants of reading performance: a multilevel analysis with Portuguese students[J]. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), 2022, 27(1): 29-37.
  6. Johansson S, Myrberg E. Teacher specialization and student perceived instructional quality: what are the relationships to student reading achievement? [J]. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2019, 31(2): 177-200.
  7. Basarkod G, Marsh H W, Guo J, et al. The happy-fish-little-pond effect on enjoyment: generalizability across multiple domains and countries[J]. Learning and Instruction, 2023, 85: 101733.
  8. Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. [Eds]. PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks, 2019.
  9. Bruggink M, Swart N. Putting PIRLS to Use in Classrooms Across the Globe[M]. Switzerland: Springer, 2022.

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Wang, Y. Interpretation of the PIRLS Assessment Framework and Exploration of Reading Instructional Strategies Under the PIRLS Philosophy. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2024, 1 (5), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240308.

Subscribe Your Manuscript