Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Open Access
Research Articles

Research on the Implementation Path of China’s Multilateral Diplomacy in Optimizing and Shaping Regional Order

Shanshan Dong*
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2024, 1(7), 60-86; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240377
Received : 19 Oct 2024 / Revised : 28 Oct 2024 / Accepted : 30 Nov 2024 / Published : 25 Nov 2024
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
Over the past decade, following the 2013 Neighborhood Diplomacy Work Conference and the introduction of the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI), China has pursued multilateral diplomacy guided by the principles of “genuine multilateralism,” emphasizing equal consultation, openness, inclusivity, mutual benefit, and win-win cooperation. China’s efforts have focused on improving and reshaping regional order to promote common prosperity by prioritizing projects that benefit neighboring countries and enhance shared well-being. This includes providing regional public goods, developing inclusive regional industrial chains, facilitating trade and investment liberalization through the establishment of free trade zones, and strengthening regional identity through enhanced security and mutual trust. Simultaneously, China has sought to reshape the narrative around multilateralism, challenging the U.S.’s unilateralism and exclusive mini-lateral mechanisms designed to maintain its hegemony. China’s approach offers solutions and a “Chinese proposal” to address the fragmentation of global governance, the increasing complexity of global challenges, and the decline in multilateral cooperation, which has been exacerbated by intensifying great-power competition and rising inequity. Beyond participating in and promoting reform within existing multilateral organizations, China has also led or contributed to the establishment of new regional cooperation platforms under the BRI. This includes micro-regional corridors along the Silk Road Economic Belt, which offer a “three-in-one” public goods framework to participating countries, fostering an inclusive transformation of the regional economic order through the integration of supply and demand. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), by advocating a security community and advancing the Global Security Initiative, has provided a hybrid of security and development public goods, contributing to the formation of an inclusive regional security order. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), along with the BRICS coalition and the New Development Bank, has supplemented and refined regional and global financial systems by offering material benefits, multilateral institutional cooperation, and shared value propositions. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), co-led by China and ASEAN, has created an expansive free trade area that serves as a foundation for the integration of diverse principles and institutions within the Asia-Pacific Free Trade Area and the Asia-Pacific Community of Shared Future. The Lancang-Mekong Cooperation (LMC) mechanism, by adhering to inclusive and effective multilateralism based on “coexistence, co-governance, and co-sharing,” has spearheaded the joint development of public goods in areas such as water resources, infrastructure, and environmental protection, fostering a high-quality sub-regional order and a shared future for the Lancang-Mekong countries. Shaping the future Asia-Pacific regional order will require China and regional partners to leverage local cooperation practices and embrace open regionalism, asserting leadership and innovation in optimizing and reshaping regional dynamics.
 
Keywords: Multilateral Diplomacy, Regional Public Goods, Regional Order, Belt and Road Initiative, AIIB, China-ASEAN Cooperation
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    This paper presents findings from two projects funded by the National Social Science Fund: the Key Project “Sub-regional Cooperation and Changes in Regional Patterns in Southeast Asia” (Project No. 22ASS004) and the General Project “Risk Management and Mitigation of Default in Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects During the Implementation of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’”(Project No. 20CGJ025).

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References:

  1. Li, J. (2022). On the order function of multilateralism and its legal composition. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities & Social Sciences Edition), (11).
  2. Qin, Y. (2013). Global governance failures and the reconstruction of order concepts. World Economy and Politics, (4).
  3. Li, X. (2021). Rethinking multilateralism and restructuring world order. Northeast Asia Forum, (6).
  4. Sun, X. (2022). Indo-Pacific or Asia-Pacific? — Spatial evolution, geopolitical restructuring, and the future of regional order. Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Studies, (5).
  5. People’s Daily Online. (2016, October 12). Promoting global development and creating a model of multilateral cooperation. BRICS. http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2016/1012/c1001-28773574.html
  6. Wu, Z. (2020, July 31). Promoting global development and creating a model of multilateral cooperation. Qiushi Theory. http://www.qstheory.cn/llwx/2020-07/31/c_1126307079.htm
  7. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Peoples Republic of China. (2014). Article 21 of the Fortaleza Declaration of the Sixth BRICS Summit (Full Text). http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/ziliao_674904/zt_674979/ywzt_675099/2014zt_675101/xzxcxhw_6
  8. Yuan, J. (2023). Forging a new security order in Eurasia: China, the SCO, and the impacts on regional governance. Chinese Political Science Review, 8(3), 422-439.
  9. Shen, M., & Guo, M. (2021). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) amid major changes: Characteristics, impacts, and opportunities. Contemporary World, (1), 49.
  10. Lawrence, R. Z. (2021, March). The unappreciated trend toward unilateral trade liberalization. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Policy Brief, (21-6), 11. https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/pb21-6.pdf
  11. Cruz, H. I. I. (2021, February 22). The RCEP: The new trade Asian block facing Latin America and Caribbean. Observatorio Económico Latinoamericano. http://www.obela.org/enanalisis/the-rcep-the-new-trade-asian-block-facing-latin-america-and-the-caribbean
  12. Zhai, K., & Zhang, T. (2023). Upholding innovation and building an inclusive subregional order in Lancang-Mekong cooperation. International Studies, (1), 53.
  13. Cheng, Y. (2023). The historical evolution and narrative reconstruction of Chinese multilateralism. Diplomatic Review, (4).
  14. Qi, H. (2019). The process, characteristics, and challenges of 70 years of China’s multilateral diplomacy with neighboring countries. World Economy and Politics, (6).
  15. Li, Y. (2021). Competition of multilateralism ideologies: A comparative study of China-U.S. Mekong sub-regional cooperation mechanisms. Diplomatic Review, (5).
  16. Wei, L. (2020). Local practices and regional order: ASEAN, China, and Indo-Pacific construction. Studies on Nanyang Issues, (2).
  17. Sun, X. (2022). Indo-Pacific or Asia-Pacific? — Spatial evolution, geopolitical restructuring, and the future of regional order. Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Studies, (5).
  18. Gu, B. (2023). The theoretical framework and observations of Chinese-style multilateralism: An analysis focusing on the AIIB. International Economic Review, (9).
  19. Zhang, L., & Ding, R. (2022). Insights on the reconstruction of multilateral economic and trade rules from the diversified provisions of RCEP. Jianghuai Forum, (1).
  20. Zhai, K. (2023). Maintaining integrity and innovating in Lancang-Mekong water cooperation: Constructing an inclusive sub-regional order. International Issues Research, (1).
  21. Li, X. (2021). Rethinking multilateralism and restructuring world order. Northeast Asia Forum, (6).
  22. Cui, S., & Jiao, Y. (2021). Research on China’s developmental finance internationalization from the perspective of South-South cooperation. Teaching and Research, (12).
  23. Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019). Towards a global international relations: A century of reflection on the discipline of international relations. Chinese Social Sciences Evaluation, (4).
  24. Zhu, X. (2023). China’s global governance perspective: Theoretical basis, internal logic, and practical principles. International Issues Research, (2).
  25. Xu, Y., & Cao, S. (2022). A theoretical analysis of multilateralism and the crisis of global governance practice. Teaching and Research, (5).
  26. Wu, Z. (2020). Promoting multilateralism and global governance from a Chinese perspective. World Economy and Politics, (9).
  27. Ma, T. (2020). The construction of an inclusive global value chain under the Belt and Road Initiative: A perspective on the supply and demand of public goods. World Economy and Politics, (4).
  28. Zheng, Y. (2020). The crisis and transformation of 21st-century multilateralism. World Economy and Politics, (8).
  29. He, Z. (2020). Reshaping global governance: The path to inclusive multilateralism. New Horizons, (6).
  30. Xie, F. (2019). The acceleration of the new industrial revolution and the direction of global governance transformation. Economic Research, (7).
  31. Zhang, N. (2021). Multilateralism in international law and its contemporary implications. International Law Studies, (3).
  32. Qin, Y. (2013). Global governance failures and the reconstruction of order concepts. World Economy and Politics, (4).
  33. Su, C. (2013). The possibility of a symbiotic international system: How to build new great power relations in a multipolar world? World Economy and Politics, (9).
  34. Huang, H. (2022). The provision of regional public goods amidst reforms in the multilateral trade system and China’s role. Contemporary World, (12).
  35. Huang, H., & Yang, H. (2017). Regional public goods and the Lancang-Mekong cooperation mechanism. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences Edition), (1).
  36. Ye, H. (2021). Promoting high-quality development of the Belt and Road Initiative through multilateralism: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Decision Research, (1).
  37. Zhao, J. (2021). Preserving and innovating in international law: A perspective on the normative needs for global governance reform. Chinese Social Sciences, (2).
  38. Li, J. (2022). On the order function of multilateralism and its legal composition. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities & Social Sciences Edition), (11).
  39. Nie, W. (2020). A comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese concepts of order in Southeast Asia and the evolutionary trends of regional order. Contemporary Asia-Pacific, (6).
  40. Shen, M. (2021). From rule taker to global provider of public goods: A review and prospects of China’s 20 years in the WTO. Journal of the Central Party School (National Academy of Governance), (5).
  41. Ding, T., & Gao, F. (2024). An analysis of securitization amid ‘weaponization of interdependence’: A case study of U.S.-China technological competition. Journal of International Security Studies, (1).
  42. Luo, H., & Zhang, L. (2023). Convergence and divergence: Understanding the dual dimensions of the Asia-Pacific regional economic order. Pacific Journal, (3).
  43. Zheng, Y., & He, D. (2024). Concept of a China-ASEAN common market: Objectives, drivers, and pathways. Journal of International Economic Cooperation, (1).
  44. Zhai, K. (2024). ‘Dilemma as mission’: Constructing an inclusive regional order involving China, ASEAN, and the United States? Journal of International Economic Cooperation, (3).
  45. Zhang, L. (2023). New developments in regional economic integration amid great power competition and China’s strategies. Forum of World Economy and Politics, (3).
  46. Liu, H. (2024). Global supply chain restructuring from a geopolitical economy perspective. Forum of World Economy and Politics, (3).
  47. Wang, C., & Jia, B. (2024). What constitutes ‘true multilateralism’? — A comparative study of U.S. and China’s multilateral diplomacy. Forum of World Economy and Politics, (3).
  48. Pan, X. (2022). Prospects of the ‘Indo-Pacific Economic Framework’ and its impact on Asia-Pacific economic integration. Journal of International Affairs, (6).
  49. Fan, C., & Mo, M. (2024). RCEP and the integration of overlapping free trade areas in the Asia-Pacific region. Northeast Asia Forum, (2).
  50. Shen, M., & Zhang, Z. (2023). New developments in the restructuring of East Asian regional value chains and response strategies. Journal of International Trade, (9).
  51. Ma, S., & Zhang, E. (2021). Restructuring of East Asian regional industrial chains under the RCEP framework and China’s countermeasures. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), (4).
  52. Zhang, Y. (2020). Restructuring regional value chains under RCEP and China’s policy choices: Based on the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative. Asia-Pacific Economy, (5).
  53. Zhu, X., & Han, W. (2023). Failures, contradictions, and China’s optimizing practices in the global economic governance system. Journal of International Economics and Trade Exploration, (9).
  54. Liu, X. (2023). Industrial competition and rule reshaping: The ‘Indo-Pacific Economic Framework’ and the U.S.’s new economic strategy against China. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (3).
  55. Zhao, M. (2023). The complex security dilemma in the Asia-Pacific region and China’s response. Contemporary World and Socialism, (4).
  56. Bisley, N. (2019). Contested Asia’s ‘new’ multilateralism and regional order. The Pacific Review, 32(2).
  57. Kolmaš, M., Qiao-Franco, G., & Karmazin, A. (2024). Understanding region formation through proximity, interests, and identity: Debunking the Indo-Pacific as a viable regional demarcation. The Pacific Review, (1).
  58. He, K. (2019). Contested multilateralism 2.0 and regional order transition: Causes and implications. The Pacific Review, 32(2).
  59. Dunford, M., & Liu, W. (2024). China’s evolving international economic engagement: China as a threat or a new pole in an equitable multipolar world order? Area Development and Policy, 9(2).
  60. He, K. (2022). China’s rise, institutional balancing, and the (possible) peaceful order transition in the Asia-Pacific. The Pacific Review, 35(6).
  61. Pempel, T. J. (2022). Sources of peace in East Asia: Interdependence, institutions, and middle powers. The Pacific Review, 35(6).
  62. Soong, J.-J. (2022). The political economy of China’s rising role in regional international organizations: Are there strategies and policies of the ‘Chinese way’ considered and applied? The Chinese Economy, 55(4).

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Dong, S. Research on the Implementation Path of China’s Multilateral Diplomacy in Optimizing and Shaping Regional Order. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2024, 1 (7), 60-86. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240377.

Subscribe Your Manuscript