Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Open Access
Research Articles

Global Cyberspace Governance Crisis and Response in the Digital Age

Xinyang Lyu*
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2024, 1(7), 87-98; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240378
Received : 30 Oct 2024 / Revised : 30 Oct 2024 / Accepted : 31 Oct 2024 / Published : 25 Nov 2024
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
In the digital age, cyberspace has emerged as a new frontier for major power exploration and competition. Initially considered an auxiliary means of traditional combat, cyber warfare has evolved into an independent mode with significant impact, extending the nature and forms of conflict. It is imperative that nations recognize cyber warfare as an inseparable component of modern warfare and deeply understand the importance of strengthening data sovereignty in cyberspace. This concerns the fundamental aspects of national security and is crucial for maintaining the health of the global internet ecosystem. Furthermore, it is key to fostering peace and stability within our “global village”. By strengthening international cooperation to jointly address cybersecurity threats, humanity can take steps toward a safer and more prosperous digital future.
 
Keywords: Cybersecurity, Cyberspace Governance, Global Digital Governance
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References:

  1. Singer, P. W., & Brooking, E. T. (2019). Like war: Weaponization of social media. HarperCollins.
  2. Shen, Y., & Sun, Y. (2019). Reconstructing Threat Perception and Rebuilding Strategic Mutual Trust - National Cyberspace Governance Capacity Building in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of the Central Academy of Socialism, (05), 101-109.
  3. Ruan, J., & Zhang, D. (2024). U.S. Layered Cyber Deterrence Strategy and China’s Response. Socialist Studies, (03), 162-172.
  4. Manulis, M., Bridges, C. P., Harrison, R., Sekar, V. & Davis, A. (2021). Cyber security in New Space: Analysis of threats, key enabling technologies and challenges. International Journal of Information Security, 20, 287-311.
  5. Yu, D., & Cai, C. (2024). China-India Cyberspace Security Cooperation: Opportunities, Challenges and Responses. Journal of International Relations, (05), 116-135+158-159.
  6. Liu, Y., & Wei, Y. (2023). Multiple Risks of Data Sovereignty Security under the Perspective of Cyberwarfare and Response Strategies. Journal of Intelligence, (05), 54-60.
  7. Luo, Y. (2022). Research on Cyberspace Sovereignty from the Perspective of Structural Functionalism. [Master dissertation, West China Normal University].
  8. Xu, F. (2022). The establishment and maintenance of network sovereignty and data sovereignty. Beijing Social Science, (07), 55-64.
  9. Fang, B. (2017). Research on Cyberspace Sovereignty. China Science Publishing.
  10. Lee, H. (2022). Cyber Confrontation in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict and Its Impact on Cyberspace Security. China Information Security, (06), 83-86.
  11. Xinhua Official Website (2021). Ministry of National Security Announces Three Cases of Endangering Important Data Security. http://www.news.cn/legal/2021-10/31/c_1128014674.htm
  12. Lu, C. (2020). The Evolution of Great Power Relations in Cyberspace and the Construction of Strategic Stabilization Mechanism. Foreign Social Sciences, (02), 96-105.
  13. Yang, C. (2023). On the Risk and Governance of Military Application of Artificial Intelligence under the Threshold of National Security - Taking the Russia-Ukraine Conflict as an Example. International Forum, (02), 61-82+157.
  14. Cai, C., & Zhang, L. (2023). Systemic Dilemma and Direction Choice: Analyzing the Reality and Way Forward of Global Cyberspace Governance. Contemporary China and the World, (04), 25-34+123.
  15. Chu, D. (2023). Geopolitics and beyond borders: an analysis based on Russian think tanks’ perception of the Ukrainian crisis. Russian East European Central Asian Studies, (02), 122-137+157-158.
  16. Liu, Y. (1998). Western neorealist theory and constructivist criticism. World Economy and Politics, (11), 26-30.
  17. Qin, Y. (2001). The Anarchy of the International System: A Reading of Alexander Wendt’s Social Theory of International Politics. The Chinese Journal of American Studies, 15(2), 135-145.
  18. World Internet Conference (2023). Collection of practical cases on Joining hands to build a community of destiny in cyberspace. https://cn.wicinternet.org/2023-11/07/content_36953570.htm
  19. Xu, L. (2023). Global cyberspace governance: core issues, Chinese programs and future directions. Chinese Journal of European Studies, (06), 58-79+6.
  20. Tyler Baum (2022). Twitter Brings out Fake News Policy as Elon Musk Panics over Bots and Deal Remains “on Hold”. https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/18637838/twitter-brings-out-fake-news-policy/
  21. Alex Friedland (2022). AI and the invasion of Ukraine, how an Nvidia hack could help China, tech talk in the SOTU, and the ODNI’s annual threat assessment. https://cset.georgetown.edu/newsletter/march-10-2022/
  22. Jane Wakefield (2022). Deepfake Presidents Used in Russia-Ukraine War. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60780142
  23. Hunter, R. (2022). The Ukraine Crisis: Why and What now? Survival, 64(1), 7-28.

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Lyu, X. Global Cyberspace Governance Crisis and Response in the Digital Age. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2024, 1 (7), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240378.

Subscribe Your Manuscript