Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Open Access
文章

Street Struggles: How Japan’s 1960s and 1970s Social Movements Shaped Democratization


Ziwei Zhang1,*, Weiyong Xia2

School of Government, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
School of Government, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
Correspondence: Ziwei Zhang, E-mail: zzwendy88@gmail.com
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2024, 1(8), 42-59; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240416
Received : 30 Oct 2024 / Revised : 04 Nov 2024 / Accepted : 06 Nov 2024 / Published : 31 Dec 2024
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
How do social movements contribute to democratization by expanding political participation, spreading democratic values, and shaping political culture? Tilly’s extensive covariation theory posits that social movements can only promote democratization under certain conditions. Building on this theory, this paper examines three specific situations in which social movements advance democratization. In each of these situations, the additional effects generated by social movements must be converted into key factors that foster democratization through emotional, reinforcement, and bonding mechanisms. Using Japan as a case study, the paper argues that while post-1945 top-down reforms laid the foundation, grassroots movements in the 1960s and 1970s were crucial in driving the process. These movements influenced government policies, promoted democratic ideals, and created a cultural environment conducive to democratic development, adapting democratic practices to Japan’s unique context.
 
Keywords: Social Movements, Japan, Democratization, Covariation Relationship
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Adam P. & Michael E. A. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Ando, T. (2020). Toward the reintegration of social movement research and democracy research. Sociological Studies, (104), 145–173.
  3. Andrew J. F., Cindy S., & Bruce B. (2006). Modeling the structure of collective action. Communication Monographs, 73(1), 29–54.
  4. Asai, Y. (1999). Postwar economic reforms in Japan: Demilitarization and democratization. Land System History Studies.
  5. Charles T. (2003). Contention and democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Charles T., & Wood, L. J. (2019). Social movements, 1768–2018. Routledge.
  7. Daniel T. (2020). Democracy by mistake: How the errors of autocrats trigger transitions to freer government. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 1–19.
  8. David C. (2008). From class struggle to general middle-class society to divided society: Societal models of inequality in postwar Japan. Social Science Japan Journal, 11(1), 5–27.
  9. Dōjidaishi Gakkai. (2004). The contemporary history of occupation and democracy. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyōronsha.
  10. Eva B. (2004). The robustness of authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, 36(2), 139–157.
  11. Guo, X., & Wang, C. (2015). The two faces of state capacity: The role and limitations of state capacity in democratic consolidation. Foreign Theoretical Trends, (2), 122–130.
  12. Hiroi T. & Sawa O. (2009). Perils of parliamentarism? Political systems and the stability of democracy revisited. Democratization, 16, 485–507.
  13. Ichihashi, H. (2014). A study of the history of Vietnam anti-war movements in Japan: The era of the Fukuoka “Ten Days” demonstrations (1). Japan-Asia Studies, (11).
  14. Ikuo K. & Dingping G. (Trans.). (2014). The trajectory of postwar Japanese politics: The formation and evolution of the LDP system. Shanghai People's Publishing House.
  15. Jan D. R. (2016). The sources of democratic consolidation. Acta Politica, 41(1), 452–456.
  16. Jasper J. M. (1998). The emotions of protest: Affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements. Sociological Forum, 13, 397–424.
  17. Jin, Y. (2018). The transformation and direction of Japan's political public opinion space: A perspective on the ups and downs of Asahi Shimbun. Northeast Asia Journal, (6), 13–18.
  18. John G., Strom T., & Matthew S. (2009). Are parliamentary systems better? Comparative Political Studies, 42(1), 327–359.
  19. John W. D. (1999). Embracing defeat: Japan in the wake of World War II. W.W. Norton & Company.
  20. Juan J. L. & Alfred S. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  21. Kubo, K., Suechika, K., & Takahashi, Y. (2016). The way of thinking in comparative political science. Yuhikaku Publishing.
  22. Larry D. & Richard G. (2001). Political parties and democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  23. Mary A. H. (2010). The state-in-society approach to the study of democratization with examples from Japan. Democratization, 17(5), 997–1023.
  24. Matsumoto, K. (2011). The formation of the concept of “citizen activity”: Focusing on the relationship with related concepts and the historical background. Hosei University Graduate School Bulletin Editorial Committee.
  25. Michael A. & Victor M. (2012). Coercive capacity and the prospects for democratization. Comparative Politics, 44(2), 151–169.
  26. Oishi, H. (2020). The salvation of the masses and mass communication. Mass Communication Research, (97), 17–34.
  27. Oyama, R. (2016). Democracy conditions by Sunahara Yosuke. Annual Journal of Public Administration Studies, (51), 157–159.
  28. Samuel P. H. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.
  29. Sasaki-Uemura, W. (2001). Organizing the spontaneous: Citizen protest in postwar Japan. University of Hawaii Press.
  30. Seymour M. L. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.
  31. Seymour M. L. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Western Political Quarterly, 13(2), 543–544.
  32. Shiobara, T. (1963). Postwar social movements in Japan. Sociological Review, 13(1), 5–21.
  33. Stepan, A & Skach, C. (2011). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus presidentialism. World Politics, 46(1).
  34. Timothy. B. G. (2003). Collective memories and collective identities: Maintaining unity in American educational social movements. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(5), 495.
  35. Travis H. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
  36. Wang, Z. (2011). A study of Japan's political democratization process. Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore.
  37. Women Questioning the Present Committee. (n.d.). Women and the 60-Year Security Treaty. In Notes on the Home Front in Postwar Japan (Vol. 5, p. 64).
  38. Yasuda, T. (2002). Notes on autonomy and publicness in modern history: Through the “experience” of the opposition movement against the Yokohama New Freight Line. The Journal of Law and Political Science.

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Subscribe Your Manuscript