Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
MOSP / Journal / Journal of International Economy and Global Governance

Journal Menu

Home
Aims & Scope
Editorial Board
For Authors
Ethics & Policies
APC & Subscription
Editorial Office

Journal Browser

Vol.2 (2025) Iss. 1 / 2 / 3 / 4
Vol.1 (2024) Iss. 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8

Table of Contents

Abstract
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
License
Open Access
文章

Fintech Innovation and Regulation - The Case of Regulatory Sandbox in Hong Kong

Yuting Tan1,*, Yuzhu Tan2

1 Faculty of Law, University of Macau, MACAU S.A.R. China
2 Faculty of Humanities and Education, Jiangmen Polytechnic, Jiangmen, China
* Correspondence: Yuting Tan, E-mail: yc27215@umac.mo
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2024, 1(8), 60-79; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240417
Received : 21 Oct 2024 / Revised : 13 Nov 2024 / Accepted : 24 Nov 2024 / Published : 31 Dec 2024
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Download
Cite
Abstract
 
The article provides an in-depth analysis of the impact of Fintech on the regulation of financial markets, and the Regulatory Sandbox as a supplement to traditional regulatory methods which helps to respond to new challenges. The rapid development of Fintech has changed the situation of the financial market and brought a certain impact and influence to the traditional financial market. Through the case research of Hong Kong’s Regulatory Sandbox, this article comprehensively introduces Hong Kong’s current Fintech Regulatory Sandbox. Moreover, it analyses and summarizes its strengths, such as consumer protection measures, and other points worth learning. At the end of the article, it puts forward an outlook on future financial regulatory trends along with advice and action plans, such as promoting cross-border regulatory cooperation. These proposals aim to help regulators better adapt to the challenges in the Fintech era and protect the health and transparency of financial markets, in parallel with sustainable development of financial innovation.
 
Keywords: Fintech, Financial Innovation, Regulatory Sandbox, Financial Regulation, Hong Kong
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Institute of Financial Technology, Tsinghua University. (2019). Impact of Fintech on the Existing Regulatory Model.
  2. Ge Tong et al. (2017). Capital Market Risk and Macrofinancial Leverage. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Quantitative Economics.
  3. Beckstedde et al. (2023). Regulatory sandboxes: Do they speed up innovation in energy? Energy Policy, 180, 113656.
  4. Fahy, L. A. (2022). Fostering regulator–innovator collaboration at the frontline: A case study of the UK’s regulatory sandbox for Fintech. Law & Policy, 44(2), 162-184.
  5. Gomber, P et al. (2018). On the fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of management information systems, 35(1), 220-265.
  6. Zhu, T et al. (2016). The potential risks and regulatory responses of fintech. Financial Regulation Research, 7, 18-32.
  7. Bu, Y et al. (2022). Effective regulations of FinTech innovations: The case of China. Economics of innovation and new technology, 31(8), 751-769.
  8. Wojcik, D. (2021). Financial geography II: The impacts of FinTech–Financial sector and centres, regulation and stability, inclusion and governance. Progress in Human Geography, 45(4), 878-889.
  9. Ndung'u, N. (2018). Handbook of Blockchain, Digital Finance, and Inclusion, Volume 1. Academic Press.
  10. Zhou, X et al. (2021). FinTech innovation regulation based on reputation theory with the participation of new media. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 67, 101565.
  11. Kane, E. J. (1981). Accelerating Inflation, Technological Innovation, and the Decreasing Effectiveness of Banking Regulation. The Journal of Finance, 36(12), 355-367.
  12. Neuwirth, R. J et al. (2024). Regulating FinTech in the Greater Bay Area: RegTech and the Role of Regulatory Sandboxes. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 12, cxae014.
  13. Khiaonarong, T et al. (2020). FinTech and payments regulation: An analytical framework. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 14(2), 157-171.
  14. Zetsche, D et al. (2017). From FinTech to TechFin: the regulatory challenges of data-driven finance. NYUJL & Bus., 14, 393.
  15. Arner, D. W et al. (2015). The evolution of Fintech: A new post-crisis paradigm. Geo. J. Int'l L., 47, 1271.
  16. Stulz, R. M. (2019). Fintech, bigtech, and the future of banks. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(4), 86-97.
  17. Chiu, I. H. (2016). Fintech and disruptive business models in financial products, intermediation and markets-policy implications for financial regulators. J. Tech. L. & Pol'y, 21, 55.
  18. Roca, J. B et al. (2017). When risks cannot be seen: Regulating uncertainty in emerging technologies. Research Policy, 46(7), 1215-1233.
  19. Hongfei, J. et al. (2020). FinTech, Banking Risks and Market Crowding-out Effect. Journal of Finance and Economics, 46(05), 52-65.
  20. Lower, R. C. (1991). Disruptions of the Futures Market: A Comment on Dealing with Market Manipulation. Yale J. on Reg., 8, 391.
  21. Omarova, S. T. (2020). Dealing with disruption: emerging approaches to fintech regulation. Wash. UJL & Pol'y, 61, 25.
  22. Restoy, F. (2021). Fintech regulation: how to achieve a level playing field. Financial Stability Institute, Bank for International Settlements.
  23. Ahern, D. (2021). Regulatory lag, regulatory friction and regulatory transition as FinTech disenablers: calibrating an EU response to the regulatory sandbox phenomenon. European Business Organization Law Review, 22(3), 395-432.
  24. Treleaven, P. (2015). Financial regulation of FinTech. Journal of Financial Perspectives, 3(3).
  25. Alam, N et al. (2019). Fintech and Islamic finance. sl: Springer International Publishing.
  26. Chorzempa M et al. (2022). Chinese Fintech innovation and regulation. Asian Economic Policy Review, 17(2), 274-292.
  27. Financial Conduct Authority. (2015). Authority F C. Regulatory sandbox.
  28. Alaassar, A et al. (2021). Exploring a new incubation model for FinTechs: Regulatory sandboxes. Technovation, 103, 102237.
  29. A Allen, H. J. (2019). Regulatory sandboxes. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 87, 579.
  30. Everhart, J. R. (2020). The FinTech sandbox: An overview of regulatory sandbox regimes. Southern Journal of Business and Ethics, 12, 64-73.
  31. Bromberg, L et al. (2017). Fintech sandboxes: Achieving a balance between regulation and innovation. Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, 28(4), 314-336.
  32. Alaassar, A et al. (2021). Exploring a new incubation model for FinTechs: Regulatory sandboxes. Technovation, 103, 102237.
  33. Fáykiss, P et al. (2018). Regulatory tools to encourage FinTech innovations: The innovation hub and regulatory sandbox in international practice. Hitelintézeti Szemle/Financial and Economic Review, 17(2), 43-67.
  34. Dostov, V et al. (2017). Regulatory sandboxes as a support tool for financial innovations. Journal of Digital Banking, 2(2), 179-188.
  35. Buckley, R. P et al. (2020). Building FinTech ecosystems: regulatory sandboxes, innovation hubs and beyond. Wash. UJL & Pol'y, 61, 55.
  36. Knight, B et al. (2020). The sandbox paradox: Balancing the need to facilitate innovation with the risk of regulatory privilege. SCL Rev., 72, 445.
  37. Brown, E et al. (2022). Governing fintech and fintech as governance: The regulatory sandbox, riskwashing, and disruptive social classification. New Political Economy, 27(1), 19-32.
  38. Jenik, I et al. (2017). Regulatory sandboxes and financial inclusion. Washington, DC: CGAP, 9.
  39. Allen, H. J. (2019). Regulatory sandboxes. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 87, 579.
  40. Global Financial Innovation Network (GFIN). https://www.osc.ca/sites/default/files/2021-03/nr_20190131_gfin-webpage-content.pdf
  41. Global Financial Innovation Network (GFIN). Our Members. https://www.thegfin.com/members#MembersMain
  42. FCA. (2015). Regulatory Sandboxes 2015. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/regulatory-sandbox.pdf
  43. Watkins, P et al. (2018). First in the Nation: Arizona’s Regulatory Sandbox. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 29(1), 2.
  44. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Proposed Rules. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1W8kX2Zd0cgOb2hmCG2ELSif6lQPirxxk
  45. Allen, H. J. (2019). Sandbox boundaries. Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L., 22, 299.
  46. Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). (2023). SFC Regulatory Sandbox. https://www.sfc.hk/TC/Welcome-to-the-Fintech-Contact-Point/Virtual-assets/Virtual-asset-trading-platforms-operators/Regulatory-requirements/FAQs-on-licensing-related-matters/SFC-Regulatory-Sandbox/SFC-Regulatory-Sandbox# bfefd3dcd5eb5486d9fe33f46ad2d6be6
  47. Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). (2022). Licensing Handbook. https://www.sfc.hk/-/media/TC/assets/components/codes/files-current/zh-hant/guidelines/licensing-handbook/licensing- handbook.pdf?rev=5ae4338e735548da88cb38a86b845d62
  48. Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). (2018). Statement on regulatory framework for virtual asset portfolio managers, fund distributors and trading platform operators. https://www.sfc.hk/TC/News-and-announcements/Policy-statements-and-announcements/ statement-on-regulatory-framework-for-virtual-asset-portfolios-managers
  49. Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). (2023). Fintech Regulatory Sandbox 2.0. https://www.hkma.gov.hk/chi/key-functions/international-financial-centre/Fintech/Fintech-supervisory-sandbox-fss/#cross-sector- Fintech-services
  50. Hong Kong Insurance Authority (IA) Insurance Technology Sandbox. https://www.ia.org.hk/sc/aboutus/insurtech_corner.html
  51. Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). (2023). Fintech Regulatory Sandbox. https://www.hkma.gov.hk/chi/key-functions/international-financial-centre/Fintech/Fintech-supervisory-sandbox-fss/#cross-sector- Fintech-services
  52. Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). (2018). Statement on regulatory framework for virtual asset portfolio managers, fund distributors and trading platform operators. https://www.sfc.hk/TC/News-and-announcements/Policy-statements-and-announcements/ statement-on-regulatory-framework-for-virtual-asset-portfolios-managers
  53. Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). (2023). Fintech Regulatory Sandbox. https://www.hkma.gov.hk/chi/key-functions/international-financial-centre/Fintech/Fintech-supervisory-sandbox-fss/#cross-sector- Fintech-services
  54. Hong Kong Insurance Authority (IA) Insurance Technology Sandbox. https://www.ia.org.hk/sc/aboutus/insurtech_corner.html
  55. Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). (2023). Fintech Regulatory Sandbox. https://www.hkma.gov.hk/chi/key-functions/international-financial-centre/Fintech/Fintech-supervisory-sandbox-fss/#cross-sector- Fintech-services
  56. Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). (2023). Fintech Regulatory Sandbox. https://www.hkma.gov.hk/chi/key-functions/international-financial-centre/Fintech/Fintech-supervisory-sandbox-fss/#cross-sector- Fintech-services
  57. Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). (2018). Statement on regulatory framework for virtual asset portfolio managers, fund distributors and trading platform operators. https://www.sfc.hk/TC/News-and-announcements/Policy-statements-and-announcements/ statement-on-regulatory-framework-for-virtual-asset-portfolios-managers
  58. Hong Kong Insurance Authority. (IA) Insurance Technology Sandbox. https://www.ia.org.hk/sc/aboutus/insurtech_corner.html
  59. Authority, F. C. (2015). Developing our approach to implementing MiFID II conduct of business and organizational requirements. Financial Conduct Authority.
  60. Pavlidis, G. (2021). Europe in the digital age: regulating digital finance without suffocating innovation. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(2), 464-477.
  61. Bromberg, L et al. (2018). Cross-border cooperation in financial regulation: crossing the Fintech bridge. Capital Markets Law Journal, 13(1), 59-84.
  62. Prasad, E. S. (2010). Financial sector regulation and reforms in emerging markets: An overview.
  63. Beckstedde, E et al. (2023). Regulatory sandboxes: Do they speed up innovation in energy? Energy Policy, 180, 113656.
  64. Najaf, K et al. (2021). Fintech firms and banks sustainability: why cybersecurity risk matters? International Journal of Financial Engineering, 8(02), 2150019.
  65. Dorfleitner, G et al. (2023). Promise not fulfilled: FinTech, data privacy, and the GDPR. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 33.
  66. Anagnostopoulos, I. (2018). Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 7-25.
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. 
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Subscribe Your Manuscript
Branches
HanLin Group
澳科中文官网
Book Center
Patent Center
Services
For Authors
Book Builder
Projects
Young Mind
Beyond Expo.
About us
MOSP Team
MOAJ Team
Blog & News
Partnership
Careers
Contact
© 2021-2023 Macao Scientific Publishers ( Macao, P.R. China )
www.mospbs.com