Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Open Access
文章

Product Attributes and International Rules: China’s Image Differentiation among International Development Cooperation Fields?


Yongqing Zhang1,*

School of International Relations, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China
Correspondence: Yongqing Zhang, E-mail: 18160121@bfsu.edu.cn
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2024, 1(8), 80-100; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240419
Received : 04 Nov 2024 / Revised : 08 Nov 2024 / Accepted : 25 Nov 2024 / Published : 31 Dec 2024
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
China’s image in different international development cooperation fields shows four types: Highly Recognized, Comparatively Recognized, Lowly Recognized and Not Recognized. In terms of the image differentiation, this paper points that the product attributes of the aid field and the international rules at the time of China’s entry into the field jointly affect the construction of China’s state image as a latecomer. The former determines the construction efficiency of China’s country image in its natural state through the degree of visibility and benefit, while the latter generates unnatural resistance through gravitational and clutter effects. Under the same rule resistance, a high degree of visibility and benefit in the hard domain is more conducive to China breaking through the blockade of established international rules and building a positive national image in the target country. The case study results show that the theoretical framework does have some explanatory power, as the low visibility and profitability of national governance policy concepts, coupled with the strong exclusion of China from Western-style democratic governance, makes overseas countries disapprove China in governance. The “strong visibility” and “strong benefits” of infrastructure projects, coupled with freedom from the pernicious interference of closed international rules, have led to strong recognition of China’s cooperative behaviour in this area.
 
Keywords: China’s Image, International Development Cooperation, Image Differentiation, Product Attributes, International Rules
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Custer, S., Horigoshi, A., & Marshall, K. (2024). BRI from the Ground Up: Leaders from 129 countries evaluate a decade of Beijing’s signature initiative. Williamsburg, VA: AidData at William & Mary.
  2. Joseph, N(1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power.
  3. Robert, K., & Joseph, N. (2001). Power and Interdependence.
  4. Bouiding, K. (1959). National Image and International System, Journal of Conflict Resolution.
  5. Douglass, N. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History.
  6. Douglass, N. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance.
  7. Yuan, Z., & Fu, Q. (2020). Narrative Framing and the United States Threat Construction of Rivals. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 13(3), 33-34.
  8. Xie, T., & Benjamin, I. (2013). What Affects China’s National image? A Cross-National Study of  Public Opinion. Journal of Contemporary China, 22(83), 850-867.
  9. Lawrence, J., Zhang, Z., & Wang, G. (2020). Explaining Foreign Support for China's Global Economic Leadership. International Organization, 74(3), 417-452.
  10. Stefan, M., Samuel, B., & Alexander, D. (2021). Discourse Wars and Mask Diplomacy: China's Global Image Management in Times of Crisis. Political Research Exchange, 6, 1.
  11.  

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Subscribe Your Manuscript