Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Open Access
文章

China’s Solution to Resist the "Core-Periphery" Economic Cost Transferring: China’s Economic Diplomacy in the New Era Toward ASEAN Countries in the Financial Capitalist World System


Zewen Yang1,*

Department of Diplomacy and Foreign Affairs Management, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing, China
Correspondence: Zewen Yang, E-mail: 838967571@qq.com
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2025, 2(1), 28-44; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250436
Received : 12 Nov 2024 / Revised : 20 Nov 2024 / Accepted : 25 Nov 2024 / Published : 25 Feb 2025
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
In the contemporary world system of financial capitalism, the "core country", the United States, must transfer its economic cost to "peripheral countries" such as China and the ASEAN countries to maintain its own survival and development. The unequal economic relationship characterized by the economic cost transferring poses a threat to the stability and development of ASEAN countries, prompting them to seek cooperation with China to resist cost transfers from the core country. China's economic diplomacy towards ASEAN countries in the new era caters to the urgent needs of ASEAN countries. The role of China's economic diplomacy in helping ASEAN countries resist economic cost transferring is evident in two aspects: on one hand, infrastructure construction cooperation under the “Belt and Road” Initiative promotes the establishment of a regional, localized, and production relations of real economy, which is distinct from the production relations established by financial capitals from the core country, which is characterized by strong liquidity and oriented towards the interests of financial capitals; on the other hand, financial cooperation promoted between China and ASEAN countries, such as local currency trade, facilitates the construction of a new type of international production relation that is "non-dollarized," to avoid cyclical shocks from the dollar cycle. Thus, China's economic diplomacy towards ASEAN countries in the new era provides a Chinese solution for ASEAN countries to resist the "core-periphery" economic cost transferring and offers a solid economic foundation for the construction of a China-ASEAN community of a shared future.
 
Keywords: World System Theory, Economic Cost Transferring, Economic Diplomacy, China, ASEAN
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. ASEAN Secretariat (2023). ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2023, Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 107.
  2. Terence K. Hopkins, Immanuel Wallerstein eds. (1982), World-Systems Analysis: Theory and Methodology, Calif: SAGE Publishing, 47.
  3. Wen, T., Liu, J., Huang, Y., Xue, C. (2021). Globalization and National Competition: a Comparative Study of the Seven Emerging Countries. Beijing: Oriental Press, Introduction, 33, 53-54.
  4. Zhang, S., Zhai, K. (2023). A Review and Prospect of Economic and Trade Achievements of Beltand Road Cooperation Between China and ASEAN in the Past Decade. Crossroads: Southeast Asia Studies, (05), 24-39.
  5. Hu, Z., Fu, S., Zhang, L. (2019). Study of International Trade Effect of the Infrastructureunder the Belt and Road Initiatives. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, (02), 24-44.
  6. Li, J., Cai, W. (2018). Outward Foreign Direct Investment and China`s Upgrading in Global Value Chains: In View of the “Belt and Road” Initiative. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), (03), 157-168.
  7. Zhai, K. (2024). The Joint Forces of the “Global South” and Economic Globalization: Taking China—ASEAN Joint Construction of the the “Belt and Road” as an Example. Contemporary China and World, (03), 72-74.
  8. Chen, X., Hou, Y. (2024). Research on the Service-Oriented Level of Manufacturing Input and Output in China and ASEAN Based on R&D Density Under the Upgraded CAFTA. Science and Technology Management Research, (16), 24-35.
  9. Tang, H., Xie, T. (2022). The Path of Cross border Industrial Cooperation between China and ASEAN under the RCEP Framework. People's Tribune, (06), 90-92.
  10. Dong, X., Xue, C., Wen, T. (2011). The Double Crisis of Developed Countries and Their Cost Transferring to Developing Countries. HongQi WenGao, (21), 4-9.
  11. Wang, Q. (2022). Comparative Study and Realistic Reflection on the Dilemma of Capitalist Economy Transferring from Real Economy to Virtual Economy. Social Scientist, (11), 77.
  12. Zhang, L., Hu, J. (2009). Empirical Study on Oil Prices and US Dollar Inflation. Economic Vision, (08), 49-53.
  13. Xie, F., Wang, H., Yao, X. (2024), Capital Turnover and Profit Margin Dynamics—Analysis          Based on the U.S. Economy from 1947 to 2021. Contemporary Economic Research, (10), 25.
  14. Rulli M. C., Saviori A, D’Odorico P. (2013). Global land and water grabbing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (03), 894.

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Yang, Z. China’s Solution to Resist the "Core-Periphery" Economic Cost Transferring: China’s Economic Diplomacy in the New Era Toward ASEAN Countries in the Financial Capitalist World System. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2025, 2 (1), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250436.

Subscribe Your Manuscript