Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
MOSP / Journal / Journal of International Economy and Global Governance

Journal Menu

Home
Aims & Scope
Editorial Board
For Authors
Ethics & Policies
APC & Subscription
Editorial Office

Journal Browser

Vol.2 (2025) Iss. 1 / 2
Vol.1 (2024) Iss. 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8

Table of Contents

Abstract
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
License
Open Access
文章

Subnational Science and Technology Diplomacy: Navigating Geopolitical Challenges Through the Lens of California-China Climate Cooperation

Yucan Jin1,*

1 American Studies Center, School of English and International Studies, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China
* Correspondence: Yucan Jin, E-mail: yucan_jin@bfsu.edu.cn
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2025, 2(2), 38-64; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250451
Received : 05 Jan 2025 / Revised : 17 Feb 2025 / Accepted : 25 Feb 2025 / Published : 25 Mar 2025
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Download
Cite
Abstract
 
Amid escalating geopolitical tensions, traditional state-centric science and technology (S&T) diplomacy faces significant limitations, while the urgency of the climate crisis necessitates innovative frameworks for collaboration. This article examines the critical role of subnational actors in advancing climate diplomacy, using the case of California-China climate cooperation as an illustrative example. Through an in-depth analysis of the mechanisms and dynamics of collaboration among California’s subnational entities, Chinese governmental bodies, private sectors, and academia, the study uncovers the rationale and strategies underpinning these cooperative efforts. The findings reveal that the California-China partnership exemplifies a hybrid governance model that integrates top-down initiatives with bottom-up engagement, guided by the interplay of ideas, interests, and institutionalization (I-I-I). This model is sustained by shared climate priorities, pragmatic economic incentives, and multi-level institutional networks, enabling resilience despite federal constraints and geopolitical uncertainties. By framing California-China climate cooperation as a microcosm of broader U.S.- China relations, this study highlights the transformative potential of subnational actors to navigate geopolitical fragmentation and foster global climate solutions. It contributes to the theoretical understanding of subnational S&T diplomacy by demonstrating how decentralized governance and cross-sector collaboration can transcend competition and advance shared objectives. Ultimately, this research provides a novel lens for reimagining S&T diplomacy in an era of geopolitical complexities and climate urgency intertwined, offering actionable insights for policymakers and scholars alike.
 
Keywords: Science and Technology Diplomacy, Subnational Cooperation; California- China Climate Cooperation, Geopolitical Challenges
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Project Approval No. 2024JX081).

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Congressional Research Servive. (2024, May 16). U.S.-China Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12510
  2. Gray, N. (2021, March 12). How Californians Are Weaponizing Environmental Law and How to Fix It. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/03/signature-environmental-law-hurts-housing/618264/
  3. Lieberthal, K., & Sandalow, D. (2009, January). Overcoming Obstacles to U.S.-China Cooperation on Climate Change. Brookings Institution.  https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/01_climate_change_lieberthal_sandalow.pdf
  4. Hobbs, A. (2012, September 21). Renewable Energy in California: What Has Policy Brought Us? Climate Policy Initiative. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/renewable-energy-in-california-what-has-policy-brought-us/
  5. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. (n.d.) International Energy Analysis: China Energy Program. Retrieved October 8, 2024, from https://international.lbl.gov/china-energy-program 
  6. The White House Office of the Vice President. (1997, October 29). Vice President Announces United States and China Advance Energy and Environment Cooperation. U.S. Department of State Archive. https://1997-2001.state.gov/regions/eap/971029_gore_china.html
  7. Asia Society Policy Institute. (n.d.) U.S.-China Climate Cooperation Timeline. Last Updated October 17, 2024, from https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/us-china-climate-cooperation-timeline
  8. Schwarzenegger, A., Adams, L. S., Nichols, M. D., & Goldstene, J. N. (2008, December).  Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change. California Air Resources Board for the State of California. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/cc/scopingplan/document/adopted_scoping_plan.pdf
  9. Finamore, B. (2009, October 3). California and Jiangsu Province Sign Agreement for Cooperation on Climate Policies - Part I. Natural Resources Defense Council. https://www.nrdc.org/bio/barbara-finamore/california-and-jiangsu-province-sign-agreement-cooperation-climate-policies
  10. Hocking, B. (1993). Localizing Foreign Policy: Non-central Governments and Multilayered Diplomacy (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S. D. (Ed.) (2009, September 1). Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance. MIT Press.
  12. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
  13. Setzer, J. (2015, October). Testing the Boundaries of Subnational Diplomacy: The International Climate Action of Local and Regional Governments. Transnational Environmental Law, 4(2), 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102515000126
  14. Bulkeley, H. (2013). Cities and Climate Change (1st ed.). Routledge.
  15. Rabe, B. G.(Ed.) (2010, August 16). Greenhouse Governance: Addressing Climate Change in America. Brookings Institution Press.
  16. Kellner, E., Petrovics, D., & Huitema, D. (2024). Polycentric Climate Governance: The State, Local Action, Democratic Preferences, and Power—Emerging Insights and a Research Agenda. Global Environmental Politics, 24(3), 24-47. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00753
  17. Meckling, J., & Van de Graaf, T. (2020). "Chapter 22: To engage, or not to engage? U.S. foreign policy on climate and clean energy". In Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved Dec 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972840.00031
  18. Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Non-State Actors in Global Climate Governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and Beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485
  19. Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric Systems for Coping With Collective Action and Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004 ​​​​​​​Leffel, B. (2018, March). Subnational Diplomacy, Climate Governance & Californian Global Leadership. University of Southern California Center on Public Diplomacy. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/useruploads/u39301/Subnational%20Diplomacy,%20Climate%20Governance%20&%20Californian%20Global%20Leadership%20-%20Benjamin%20Leffel_0.pdf
  20. US Energy Foundation. (2013, September 25). China, California Sign Climate MOU. https://www.ef.org/2013/09/25/china-california-sign-climate-mou/
  21.  California Energy Commission. (n.d.) Cliamate Change Partnerships. Retrieved December 8, 2024, from https://www.energy.ca.gov/about/international-cooperation/climate-change-partnerships
  22. The Climate Group. (n.d.) The Under2 Coalition. Retrieved October 8, 2024, from https://www.theclimategroup.org/under2-coalition
  23. Office of Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr..(2017, June 6). Photo Release: China Day 3: Governor Brown Meets with President Xi of the People’s Republic of China, Signs Agreement with National Government to Boost Green Technology. https://archive.gov.ca.gov/archive/gov39/2017/06/06/news19832/index.html
  24. Yuanling, L. (2024, May 13). Opinion: Strengthen Subnational Links to Promote China–US Climate Cooperation. Dialogue Earth. https://dialogue.earth/en/climate/opinion-strengthen-local-links-to-promote-china-us-climate-cooperation/
  25. Office of the Governor of California. (2023, October 28). CA-Jiangsu-MOU-2023. https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/CA-Jiangsu-MOU-2023.pdf
  26. Governor Gavin Newsom. (n.d.) What Governor Newsom’s Trip to China Accomplished. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2023/10/30/what-governor-newsoms-trip-to-china-accomplished/
  27. BYD Motors. (n.d.) Bus American Workforce. Retrieved December 13, 2024, from https://en.byd.com/bus/about/#bus-about-3
  28. BYD. (2021). BYD Produces 400th Bus at Lancaster, Calif. Manufacturing Plant. Retrieved December 13, 2024, from https://en.byd.com/news/byd-produces-400th-bus-in-lancaster/
  29. Business Wire. (2013, May 1). BYD and the City of Lancaster Announce Two Manufacturing Facilities in Lancaster, California. Retrieved December 13, 2024, from https://en.byd.com/news/byd-and-the-city-of-lancaster-announce-lancaster-energy-module-and-electric-bus-manufacturing-facilities/
  30. International Airport Review. (n.d.). Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Goes Greener with Electric Buses. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://www.internationalairportreview.com/news/68598/los-angeles-international-unveils-fleet-of-electric-buses/
  31. California-China Climate Institute. (2023, July 14). Opportunities for Enhanced Near-Term U.S.-China Climate Action: Subnational Climate Leadership [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/hetF9wS0quo?si=G76D5npTYrNnGC7b 
  32. California Environmental Protection Agency. “Press Release: California Leaders Visit China to Strengthen Climate Partnerships, Advance Global Climate Action.” Retrieved October 9, 2024, from https://calepa.ca.gov/2024/04/02/press-release-california-leaders-visit-china-to-strengthen-climate-partnerships-advance-global-climate-action/
  33. BYD. (2019, November). BYD Highlights Industrial Manufacturing Technician Apprenticeship Program During National Apprenticeship Week. Retrieved December 16, 2024, from https://en.byd.com/news/byd-proud-to-support-apprenticeship-program/
  34. Avta. (2022, March 16). AVTA Becomes First All-Electric Zero-Emission Transit Agency. https://www.avta.com/avta-becomes-first-all-electric-zero-emission-transit-agency
  35. Tesla's Gigafactory Shanghai and EV production: Tesla. (2022). Tesla vehicle production & deliveries. Retrieved from https://www.tesla.com/ir
  36. Global EV market and cost reduction through China-based production: Mou, N. (2023, January 3). Tesla Gigafactory Shanghai 2022 deliveries exceed 700,000 vehicles. CNEVPost. Retrieved from https://cnevpost.com/2023/01/03/tesla-gigafactory-shanghai-2022-deliveries-exceed-700000-vehicles/
  37. Partnerships with CATL (lithium battery supplier) and impact on EV cost efficiency: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited. (2021). Annual report. Retrieved from https://www.catl.com/en/investor/announcement/
  38. Connection between Tesla's EVs and California’s zero-emission vehicle mandate: California Air Resources Board. (2022). Zero-emission vehicle program. Retrieved from https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/zero-emission-vehicle-program
  39. Tesla’s workforce and green-skills initiatives at Gigafactory Shanghai: Choudhury, S. (2020, October 22). Tesla’s Shanghai factory ramps up hiring, hints at wider EV market push in China. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com
  40. California’s “just transition” goals and emphasis on workforce sustainability: California Workforce Development Board. (2021). Putting California on the high road: A jobs and climate action plan for 2030. Retrieved from https://cwdb.ca.gov
  41. California EV adoption target and Tesla’s contribution: California Energy Commission. (2021). 2021 IEPR update volume III: Decarbonizing transportation. Retrieved from https://www.energy.ca.gov
  42. California-China climate cooperation and subnational agreements: Office of the Governor of California. (2021). California-China climate partnership. Retrieved from https://www.gov.ca.gov/climate/
  43. “U.S.-China Cities and States Strengthen Ties to Advance Climate Action.” California-China Climate Institute, May 29, 2024, https://ccci.berkeley.edu/news/2024/05/us-china-cities-and-states-strengthen-ties-advance-climate-action
  44. [Q2 2023 Update]. (2023). In Q2 2023 Update (p. 1) [Report]. https://digitalassets.tesla.com/tesla-contents/image/upload/IR/TSLA-Q2-2023-Update.pdf
  45.  California-China Climate Institute. (2023, June 9). [WEBINAR] Opportunities for Enhanced Near-Term U.S.-China Climate Action: Zero Emissions Vehicles [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BesZPizL040
  46. California-China Climate Institute. (2022, October 17). Inside China’s National Adaptation Strategy 2035 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIwvjo5PfK4
  47. California-China Climate Institute. (2022a, May 17). An Inside Look at China and California’s Carbon Markets [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvH6WdQb1XQ 
  48. 2022 International Green Energy Summit and 14th US-China Green Energy Summit Were Successfully Held-Department of Electrical Engineering Tsinghua University. (n.d.). https://www.eea.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/info/1038/2781.htm 
  49. [Research] landing page. (n.d.). California-China Climate Institute. https://ccci.berkeley.edu/research
  50. Institute for China-America Studies. (2024, February 21). Renewing the US-China Science and Technology Agreement. Can S&T Cooperation Coexist with Decoupling? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIXNMHtlDQo
  51. Wang, B. (2024b, October 24). Four Lessons from 30 Years of US-China Climate Cooperation. Dialogue Earth. https://dialogue.earth/en/climate/four-lessons-from-30-years-of-us-china-climate-cooperation/?mc_cid=9147354ecf&mc_eid=751460e836
  52. Ching, N. (2024, December 13). US, China Sign 5-year Amended Agreement on Science and Technology Cooperation. Voice of America. https://www.voanews.com/a/us-china-sign-5-year-amended-agreement-on-science-and-technology-cooperation-/7900132.html
  53. Yu, Liang. “Feature: Chinese Electric Automaker BYD Drives Job Growth in S. California.” XinHuaNet, May 7, 2018. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-05/07/c_137159957_7.htm
  54. California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development. “International Support China.” Accessed Oct. 8, 2024. https://business.ca.gov/advantages/international-trade-and-investment/international-collaboration/international-support/ 
  55. Dai, Fan. “California-China Subnational Climate Cooperation Including the Example of GHG Cap-and-Trade Program, and the GHG Benchmarking in the Cement Industry” PhD diss., State University of New York, 2015. file:///Users/JinYucan/Downloads/Fan%20Dai%20diss%200119.pdf
  56. Center for Strategic & International Studies The Trade Guy Podcast. “A New Tariff Man in Town.” May 21, 2024, https://youtu.be/5q3sCm8d0wk?si=zeVA2EyepldaDhYS.
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. 
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Jin, Y. Subnational Science and Technology Diplomacy: Navigating Geopolitical Challenges Through the Lens of California-China Climate Cooperation. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2025, 2 (2), 38-64. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250451.

Subscribe Your Manuscript
Branches
HanLin Group
澳科中文官网
Book Center
Patent Center
Services
For Authors
Book Builder
Projects
Young Mind
Beyond Expo.
About us
MOSP Team
MOAJ Team
Blog & News
Partnership
Careers
Contact
© 2021-2023 Macao Scientific Publishers ( Macao, P.R. China )
www.mospbs.com