Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Open Access
文章

The Historical Foundations of International Relations: Evidence of Practices Before 1648 and 1919


Haoren Fang1,*

Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 2600
Correspondence: Haoren Fang, E-mail: 
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2025, 2(3), 40-53; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250492
Received : 13 Mar 2025 / Revised : 16 Apr 2025 / Accepted : 18 Apr 2025 / Published : 30 May 2025
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
This paper explores the history of International Relations, focusing on and disproving the mythologized origins of the field, particularly the Peace of Westphalia (1648) and the establishment of the League of Nations (1919). These events are often regarded as the birth of modern IR, but they overlook the contributions of non-Western civilizations and perspectives. Meanwhile, this paper aims to challenge the Eurocentric narrative that has dominated IR theory and practice and also analyzes how historical power dynamics, such as colonialism, have influenced the formation of Eurocentrism. The research employs historical analysis and a comprehensive literature review to explore the development of IR, specifically analyzing the histories of China and the Middle East. By examining the historical interactions, political systems, and diplomatic traditions in these regions, the study attempts to explore IR before 1648 and 1919, highlighting the different forms of diplomacy, statecraft, and interstate cooperation that existed across civilizations Additionally, the study employs a literature review to critically analyze academic research and explore how the Western-dominated IR discipline has overlooked the historical experiences and theoretical contributions of these non-Western regions. Ultimately, this paper concludes that IR existed long before 1648 and 1919, which challenges the Eurocentric view that these timings marked the birth of modern IR. It also argues that IR history has been shaped by oversimplified and Western-dominated narratives, and calls for a more inclusive approach that incorporates non-Western perspectives and histories, promoting a truly global understanding of the field.
 
Keywords: International Relations, Historical Milestone, Eurocentrism, Non-Western Perspectives, Distinct Political Systems
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References​​​​​​​

  1. Acharya, A. (2014). Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–659.
  2. Philpott, D. (1999). Westphalia, authority, and international society. Political Studies, 47(3), 566–589.
  3. Carvalho, B. de, Leira, H., & Hobson, J. M. (2011). The big bangs of IR: The myths that your teachers still tell you about 1648 and 1919. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 735–758.
  4. Glanville, L. (2013). The Myth of “Traditional” Sovereignty. International Studies Quarterly, 57(1), 79–90.
  5. Berridge, G. (2010). Diplomacy: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Chang, Y. (1988). The Ming Empire: Patron of Islam in China and Southeast-West Asia. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 61(2), 1–44.
  7. Phillips, J. (2019). The life and legend of the Sultan Saladin. Yale University Press.
  8. Doyle, M. W. (2017). Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs. In Immanuel Kant (pp. 503–533). Routledge.
  9. Liu, X. (2010). The Silk Road in world history. Oxford University Press.
  10. Waltz, K. N. (1988). The origins of war in neorealist theory. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 615–628.
  11. Swope, K. M. (2013). A dragon’s head and a serpent’s tail. University of Oklahoma Press.
  12. Shaughnessy, E. L. (1999). Before Confucius: Studies in the creation of the Chinese classics. State University of New York Press.
  13. Zhang, Y. (2014). The idea of order in ancient Chinese political thought: A Wightian exploration. International Affairs, 90(1), 167–183.
  14. Lu, P., Li, M., Fu, S., Onyebuchi, C. H., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Modeling the Warring States period: History dynamics of initial unified empire in China (475 BC to 221 BC). Expert Systems with Applications, 230, 120560.
  15. Morgenthau, H. J. (1973). Politics among nations. Alfred A. Knopf.
  16. General History of China (5). (2002). The Early Eastern Zhou, Spring and Autumn, and Warring States Periods: Transition from slavery to feudalism. Xinhua News Agency.
  17. Lewis, M. E. (1990). Sanctioned violence in early China. State University of New York Press.
  18. Loewe, M., & Shaughnessy, E. L. (Eds.). (1999). The Cambridge history of ancient China: From the origins of civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Soltaninejad, M. (2019). Coalition-building in Iran’s foreign policy: Understanding the 'Axis of Resistance.' Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 21(6), 716–731.
  20. Kissinger, H. (1979). White house years. Little, Brown and Company.
  21. Undrakh, D., & Chinbat, I. (2019). On five Mongolia military campaigns of Ming Emperor Yongle against the Mongols. Mongolian Journal of Foreign Languages and Culture, 23(1), 76–83.
  22. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W.W. Norton & Company.
  23. Wade, G. (2005). The Zheng He voyages: A reassessment. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 78(1), 37–58.
  24. Zsombor, R. (2015). The Timurid Empire and Ming China: Theories and approaches concerning the relations between the two empires. Department of East Asian Studies, Eötvös Loránd University.
  25. Turnbull, S. R. (2008). The Samurai invasion of Korea: 1592-98. Osprey Publishing.
  26. Whitefield, S. (1999). Life along the Silk Road. University of California Press.
  27. Fairbank, J. K., & Goldman, M. (2006). China: A new history. Harvard University Press.
  28. Donner, F. M. (2010). Muhammad and the believers: At the origins of Islam. Harvard University Press.
  29. Ahmad, M. (2022). The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah: Illuminating the path to unity and resilience in Islam. Reflections.
  30. Ibrahim, A. S. (2024). Muhammad’s military expeditions. Oxford University Press.
  31. Watt, W. M. (1956). Muhammad at Medina. Clarendon Press.
  32. Esposito, J. L., & Voll, J. O. (1996). Islam and democracy. Oxford University Press.
  33. Rizvi, M. M. A. (2012). Velayat-e-Faqih (Supreme Leader) and Iranian foreign policy: An historical analysis. Strategic Analysis, 36(1), 112–127.
  34. Asbridge, T. (2014). The Crusades: The authoritative history of the war for the Holy Land. HarperCollins e-Books.
  35. Tyerman, C. (2007). God’s war: A new history of the Crusades. Penguin.
  36. Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 287–312.
  37. Hobson, J. M. (2004). The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge University Press.
  38. Smith, S. (2000). The discipline of international relations: Still an American social science? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2(3), 374–402.
  39. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
  40. Rostow, W. W. (1990). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  41. Wallerstein, I. (2020). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press.
  42. Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton University Press.
  43. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Fang, H. The Historical Foundations of International Relations: Evidence of Practices Before 1648 and 1919. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2025, 2 (3), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250492.

Subscribe Your Manuscript