Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Open Access
文章

Why Have United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Expanded Their Use of Force? A Study From 1948 Until the Present Time


Jiayu Yao1,*

School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University of China, Xiamen, China
Correspondence: Jiayu Yao, E-mail: yjy19160051@163.com
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2025, 2(3), 54-70; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250493
Received : 16 Mar 2025 / Revised : 16 Apr 2025 / Accepted : 17 Apr 2025 / Published : 30 May 2025
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
United Nations Peacekeeping Operations (UNPKOs), established on the tripartite principles of party consent, impartiality, and force restriction to self-defense consent, have undergone a marked doctrinal evolution in force application since 1948. Through textual analysis of 71 UNPKO mandates and process-tracing of historical policy shifts, this study identifies three phases of expansion: from strict self-defense (1948–1980s), to civilian protection mandates (1990s), and ultimately to the contemporary “necessary force” doctrine permitting offensive actions to achieve mission objectives. Despite documented risks—including threats to peacekeeper safety, erosion of neutrality, civilian casualties, and North-South divisions within the UN—the trajectory toward force liberalization persists. To explain this paradox, the essay innovatively adapts Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) through two critical modifications. First, the conventional “political stream” is reconceptualized as an “environmental stream”, incorporating legal-institutional dynamics and operational realities, which captures the UN’s unique multilateral decision-making ecosystem. Second, departing from MSF’s assumption of stream independence, the revised framework posits continuous interaction among problem, policy, and environmental streams. The study concludes that three interdependent factors drive the continuous expansion of force application in UN peacekeeping operations: the evolving multiplicity of missions (problem stream), the group preserving psychology of the UN Security Council (policy stream), and the shifting operational-legal environment (environmental stream).
 
Keywords: United Nations, Use of Force, Peacekeeping
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Allard, K. (1995). Somalia Operations: Lessons Learned. National Defense University, Institute for National Strategic Studies: Washington, DC.
  2. Bay, A. (2013). Congo complexity will test U.N. offensive peacekeeping, Hearst newspapers, April 29 2013.
  3. Béland D. & Howlett, M. (2016). The Role and Impact of the Multiple-Streams Approach in Comparative Policy Analysis, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, (3): 221-227.
  4. Bellamy, A. J. & Williams, P. D. (2009). The West and Contemporary Peace Operations. Journal of peace research. [Online] (1): 39–57.
  5. Black Hawk Down. (2001). Directed by Ridley Scott, USA, Revolution Studios Productions.
  6. Day, A. (2017) The future of UN peace operations in a changing conflict environment, United Nations peacekeeping.
  7. de Coning, C. et al. (2019). United Nations Peace Operations in a Changing Global Order. 1st ed. 2019. Cedric. de Coning & Mateja. P. (eds.). [Online]. Cham: Springer Nature.
  8. Duffield, M. R. (2007). Development, security and unending war: governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity.
  9. Duursma, A., Bara, C., Wilén, N., Hellmüller, S., Karlsrud, J., Oksamytna, K. & Wenger, A. (2023). UN peacekeeping at 75: achievements, challenges, and prospects. International Peacekeeping, 30(4), 415-476.
  10. Von Einsiedel, S., Bosetti, L., Cockayne, J., Salih, C., & Wan, W. (2017). Civil war trends and the changing nature of armed conflict. Occasional paper, (10): 1-10.
  11. Findlay, T. (2002) The use of force in UN peace operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International organization, 52(4), 887-917.
  13. Howard, L. M., & Dayal, A. K. (2018). The use of force in UN peacekeeping. International Organization, 72(1), 71-103.
  14. Julian, R. & Gasser, R. (2019). Soldiers, Civilians and Peacekeeping – Evidence and False Assumptions, International Peacekeeping, 26(1), 22-54.
  15. Kapteijns, K. (2013). Test-firing the ‘new world order’ in Somalia: the US/UN military humanitarian intervention of 1992–1995, Journal of Genocide Research, 15(4), 421-442.
  16. Khalil, M. A. (2018). The world needs robust peacekeeping not aggressive peacekeeping, humanitarian law and policy, https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2018/05/15/world-needs-robust-peacekeeping-not-aggressive-peacekeeping/ [Accessed 21st January 2025].
  17. Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  18. Krishnan, S. (2020). UN Peacekeeping, Responsibility to Protect and Humanitarian Intervention. India Quarterly, 76(1), 120-135.
  19. New York Times. (23 May 2005). U.N. Forces Using Tougher Tactics to Secure Peace, New York Times.
  20. Koops, A. J., MacQueen, N., Tardy, T., & Williams, D, P. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 144-152+779-789.
  21. Ottovay Jorgensen, M. (2025). Evaluating UN peacekeeping deployment problems: the case of the United Nations Emergency Force, 1956–1967. Interventions, 1-23.
  22. Otto, S., Kube, F., & Smidt, H. (2024). UN peacekeeping upon deployment: Peacekeeping activities in theory and practice. Cooperation and Conflict, 59(4), 488-509.
  23. Panagiotou, R. (2011). The Centrality of the United Nations in Russian Foreign Policy. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (2):195–216.
  24. Pushkina, D. B., & Kalina, R. V. (2024). USA Policy Towards United Nations: The Case of UN PKOs in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4: История. Регионоведение. Международные отношения, 29(1), 157-168.
  25. Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: the art of political decision making. 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  26. Tardy, T. (2011). A Critique of Robust Peacekeeping in Contemporary Peace Operations, International Peacekeeping, 18(2): 152-167.
  27. United Nations (1992). An Agenda for Peace, Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-Keeping: Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to the Statement Adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January. New York: United Nations.
  28. United Nations (1995). Supplement to An Agenda for Peace: Position paper of the Secretary-General on the Occasion of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations. New York: United Nations.
  29. United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations (2003). Handbook on United Nations Multidimensional Peacekeeping Operations.
  30. United Nations (2020). 25 Years after Srebrenica Genocide, ‘Peace Is Still Fragile’. Secretary-General Warns in Anniversary Message, Calling for Steadfast Commitment to Reconciliation, United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations, https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/25-years-after-srebrenica-genocide-peace-is-still-fragile-secretary-general-warns-anniversar.
  31. United Nations (2024). Troop and police contributor, United Nations Peacekeeping, https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/troop-and-police-contributors.
  32. Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. In P.A. Sabatier & C.M. Weible (eds), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Yao, J. Why Have United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Expanded Their Use of Force? A Study From 1948 Until the Present Time. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2025, 2 (3), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250493.

Subscribe Your Manuscript