Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Article

Lessons of the Cold War and Biden Administration’s China Policy


Yijing Ren1,*

Institute of International Relations, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing, China   
Correspondence: Yijing Ren, E-mail: renyijing@mail.cfau.edu.cn
 
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2025, 2(5), 63-78; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250717
Received : 19 Jun 2025 / Revised : 02 Jul 2025 / Accepted : 08 Jul 2025 / Published : 20 Aug 2025
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
Since entering the period of great-power competition, the discussion around the Cold War analogy and U.S.-China relations has never been settled: in policy community, whether China and the United States are already in a “new Cold War” and whether the United States should launch a “new Cold War” against China are currently hot topics related to U.S.-China relations. However, in academic research, whether the Cold War analogy has had a substantial impact on the U.S.’s China policy needs further study. Under President Biden’s leadership, the U.S. escalated the strategic competition with China, with many aspects reflecting distinct Cold War-era dynamics. This article contributes to the existing literature by analyzing the Biden administration’s use of Cold War historical lessons on its China policy. The importance of this study is two-fold: theocratically, it suggests that historical analogy does play a critical role in shaping foreign policy decision-making; practically, it reveals that some aspects of contemporary foreign practice of the United States during President Biden’s term are deeply rooted in the past, which are likely to persist into and intensify in the coming years, therefore providing insights into understanding U.S.–China relations in Trump’s second term.
 
Keywords: Historical Analogy, Biden Administration, U.S.-China Relations, New Cold War, Great-Power Competition
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

    None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. McFaul, M. (2020). Cold War Lessons and Fallacies for US-China Relations Today. The Washington Quarterly, (4): 7-39.
  2. Nye, Joseph S. (2022). How not to deal with a rising China: a US perspective. International Affairs, (5): 1635-1651.
  3. Schweller, R. (2022). An Emerging World that Defies Historical Analogy. In Polarity in International Relations: Past, Present, Future, eds. by Græger, N., Heurlin, B., Wæver, O., Wivel, A. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Yin, J. (2020). The Cold War analogy’s misrepresentation of the essence of US-China strategic competition. China Int Strategy Rev, (2): 257-269.
  5. Khong, Y.F. (2019). The US, China, and the Cold War analogy. China Int Strategy Rev, (1): 223-237.
  6. Goldstein, A. (2020). US–China Rivalry in the twenty-first century: Déjà vu and Cold War II. China Int Strategy Rev, (2): 48–62.
  7. Harris, P. and Marinova, I. (2022). American Primacy and US-China Relations: The Cold War Analogy Reversed. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, (4): 335-351.
  8. Vertzberger, Y. (1986). Foreign Policy Decisionmakers As Practical-Intuitive Historians: Applied History and Its Shortcomings. International Studies Quarterly, (2): 223-247.
  9. Neustadt, R. and May E. (1986). Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision Makers. New York: Freedom Press.
  10. May, E. (1973). “Lessons” of the Past: The Use and Misuse of History in American Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. Levy, J. (1994). Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization, (2): 279-312.
  12. Khong, Y. (1992). Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University.
  13. Jervis, R. (1976). Perceptions and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  14. Kaplan, R. (2019) A New Cold War Has Begun. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/01/07/a-new-cold-war-has-begun/.
  15. Lind, M. (2018). America vs. Russia and China: Welcome to Cold War II. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/america-vs-russia-china-welcome-cold-war-ii-25382?nopaging=1.
  16. Brands, H. and Gaddis, J. (2021). The New Cold War: America, China, and the Echoes of History. Foreign Affairs, (6):10-20.
  17. Nye, J. (2022). How not to deal with a rising China: a US perspective. International Affairs, (5): 1635-1651. Nye, J. (2023). Not Destined for War. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-china-not-destined-for-war-by-joseph-s-nye-2023-10. Nye, J. (2021) With China, a “Cold War” Analogy Is Lazy and Dangerous. The New York Times.  https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/02/opinion/biden-china-cold-war.html.
  18. Leffler, M. (2007). For the Soul of Mankind: the United States, the Soviet Union, and the Cold War. New York: Hill and Wang.
  19. Zhang, X. (2025). The Cold War and Its Legacy, 2nd ed. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Press.
  20. Brands, H. (2022). The Twilight Struggle: What the Cold War Teaches Us about Great-Power Rivalry Today. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  21. Gaddis, J. (1987). The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. Biden, J. (2021). Remarks by President Biden on America’s Place in the World. The White House.  https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/02/04/remarks-by-president-biden-on-americas-place-in-the-world/.
  23. Blinken, A. (2021). A Foreign Policy for the American People. U.S. Department of State. https://2021-2025.state.gov/a-foreign-policy-for-the-american-people/.
  24. Zhu, F. (2024). Analysis of US Strategy and Outlook for Sino-US Relations. International Economic Review, (2): 27-33.
  25. Gu, G. (2022). Three Pillars in the Biden Administration’s China Strategy: Allies, Values, and High-Tech. International Relations and Diplomacy, (6): 277-285.
  26. The White House, (2021). https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/02/04/remarks-by-president-biden-on-americas-place-in-the-world/.
  27. Cha, V. (2023). Collective Resilience: Deterring China's Weaponization of Economic Interdependence. International Security, (1): 91–124.
  28. Bureau of Industry and Security. (2022) 87 FR 62186. Department of Commerce. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-21658/implementation-of-additional-export-controls-certain-advanced-computing-and-semiconductor. Bureau of Industry and Security. (2023). 88 FR 73458. Department of Commerce. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/10/25/2023-23055/implementation-of-additional-export-controls-certain-advanced-computing-items-supercomputer-and. Bureau of Industry and Security. (2024). 89 FR 96830. Department of Commerce. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/05/2024-28267/additions-and-modifications-to-the-entity-list-removals-from-the-validated-end-user-veu-program. Bureau of Industry and Security. (2025). 90 FR 4544. Department of Commerce. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/15/2025-00636/framework-for-artificial-intelligence-diffusion.

© The Author(s). Published by MOSP
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Ren, Y. Lessons of the Cold War and Biden Administration’s China Policy. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2025, 2 (5), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250717.

Subscribe Your Manuscript