Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Article

An Analysis of the Philippine-U.S. Game on Natural Resources and Ecology Issues in the South China Sea and the Trends of Arbitration Weaponization


Zhihao Zheng1,*

School of International Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
2 Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
Correspondence: Zhihao Zheng, E-mail: ruczzhee@163.com
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2025, 2(6), 4-22; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250832
Received : 24 Jul 2025 / Revised : 04 Sep 2025 / Accepted : 07 Sep 2025 / Published : 10 Sep 2025
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
Since the Marcos Jr. administration, the Philippines has reasserted a provocative stance in the South China Sea, deepening its coordination with the United States and extending competition into the domain of natural resources and ecology. Issues such as coral reef destruction, biodiversity loss, and fishing disputes have been securitized and employed as strategic instruments, raising the puzzle of why ecological concerns are increasingly weaponized in regional geopolitics. This study applies a qualitative case-based analysis grounded in the theoretical framework of strategic saturation and arbitration weaponization. It argues that the Philippines and the United States have resorted to ecological and resource issues for three main reasons: the saturation of traditional strategic approaches, the lack of integrated decision-making and coordination capabilities, and the demand for comfortable and feasible short-term policy tools. The analysis identifies three interrelated trends: rekindling international arbitration, expanding strategic narrative frameworks, and reshaping containment dynamics through issue linkage. The findings suggest that these dynamics will produce four critical effects: entrapment in the logical flaws of strategic narratives, the further weaponization of international arbitration, escalating strategic costs for both parties, and the lowering of the conflict threshold. The article contributes on the politicization of non-traditional security issues and the weaponization of international legal instruments, demonstrating how weaker states in alliance with external powers instrumentalize environmental issues to reshape regional order. It further highlights the risks this trajectory poses to cooperative governance, underscoring the need for solutions within the China–ASEAN framework.
 
Keywords: South China Sea Dispute, Natural Resources, Ecology, Arbitration Weaponization, Narrative Framework
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

This research was funded by the 2025 Doctoral Students Research Funds of Chenghai Institute of Global Development and Security, Renmin University of China (Grant Number: CH2025-BS-018).

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. U.S. Department of Defense,Philippines, “U.S. Announce Locations of Four New EDCA Sites”, April 3, 2023, https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3349257/philippines-us-announce-locations-of-four-new-edca-sites/.
  2. U.S. Department of Defense, “The United States and the Republic of the Philippines Bilateral Defense Guidelines”, May 3, 2023, https://media.defense.gov/2023/May/03/2003214357/-1/-1/0/THE-UNITED-STATES-AND-THE-REPUBLIC-OF-THE-PHILIPPINES-BILATERAL-DEFENSE-GUIDELINES.PDF.
  3. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, “Recent Surge in Tensions in the South China Sea”, December 13, 2023, https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/pressite_000001_00045.html.​​​​​​​
  4. “Indian Warship Docks in Manila as Tension ups in South China Sea”, The Times of India, December 14, 2023, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/indian-warship-docks-in-manila-as-tension-ups-in-south-china-sea/articleshow/105971033.cms?from=mdr.
  5. Wyeth, Grant. “Australia-Philippines Launch Joint Naval Patrol in South China Sea”, The Diplomat, November 27, 2023, https://thediplomat.com/2023/11/australia-philippines-launch-joint-naval-patrol-in-south-china-sea/.
  6. Pulta, Benjamin. “OSG Explores Various Legal Options on Coral Reef Damage in WPS”, Philippines News Agency, September 20, 2023, https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1210274.
  7. Baroña, Franco Jose and Tamayo, Bernadette. “PH to File Suit VS China”, The Manila Time, September 21, 2023, https://www.manilatimes.net/2023/09/21/news/ph-to-file-suit-vs-china/1910963.
  8. Guzman, Chad De. “Why the Philippines May Take China to Court-Again-Over the South China Sea”, Time Magazine, September 29, 2023, https://time.com/6318671/philippines-south-china-sea-international-court/.
  9. “Manila to Pick Venue Soon for Second South China Sea Case Against Beijing”, The Straits Times, January 23, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/philippines-to-pick-venue-soon-for-second-south-china-sea-case-against-beijing.
  10. Sato, Monica et al., “Deep Blue Scars: Environmental Threats to the South China Sea”, Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, Center for Strategic and International Studies, December 18, 2023, https://features.csis.org/environmental-threats-to-the-south-china-sea/.
  11. The White House, “Memorandum on Combating Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing and Associated Labor Abuses”, June 27, 2022, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/06/27/memorandum-on-combating-illegal-unreported-and-unregulated-fishing-and-associated-labor-abuses/.
  12. NOAA Fisheries, “2023 Report to Congress: Improving International Fisheries Management”, August 2023, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/s3/2023-08/2023RTC-ImprovingIFManagement.pdf.
  13. Strangio, Sebastian. “Philippines to Probe Claims of Chinese Cyanide Use at Scarborough Shoal”, The Diplomat, February 20, 2024, https://thediplomat.com/2024/02/philippines-to-probe-claims-of-chinese-cyanide-use-at-scarborough-shoal/.
  14. Office of the President of the Philippines, Presidential Communications Office, “PBBM to File Charges Fishermen Behind Cyanide Fishing in Bajo de Masinloc”, February 20, 2024, https://pco.gov.ph/news_releases/pbbm-to-file-charges-if-found-legal-basis-vs-chinese-fishermen-behind-cyanide-fishing-in-bajo-de-masinloc/.
  15. “Vietnam Ramps Up Spratly Island Dredging”, Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, November 15, 2023, https://amti.csis.org/vietnam-ramps-up-spratly-island-dredging/.
  16. Alcala, A. C. and Russ, G. R. (2002). Status of Philippines Coral Reef Fisheries. Asian Fisheries Science (15),177-192.
  17. Heydarian, Richard Javad. “Vietnam’s Legal Warfare Against China: Prospects and Challenges”, Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, November 21, 2019, https://amti.csis.org/vietnams-legal-warfare-against-china-prospects-and-challenges/.
  18. Goldenziel, Jill I. (2021). Law as a Battlefield: The U.S., China, and the Global Escalation of Lawfare. Cornell Law Review (05),1085-1172.
  19. Annual International Trade Statistics by Country (HS), “Where Does Philippines Export Fish Fillets and Other Fish Meat”, Trend Economy. https://trendeconomy.com/data/h2/Philippines/0304.
  20. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, “International Trade in Coral and Coral Reef Species: The Role of the United States, Report of the Trade Subgroup of the International Working Group to the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force”, https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/49965/noaa_49965_DS1.pdf.
  21. World Wildlife Fund, “Review of Trade in Ornamental Coral, Coral Products and Reef Associated Species to the United States”, November 2012, https://files.worldwildlife.org/wwfcmsprod/files/Publication/file/9u300hn17s_WWF_Coral_Trade_Report_Final.pdf.
  22. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People’s Republic of China, “Circular of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People’s Republic of China on the issuance of the Action Plan for the Conservation of Sea Turtles (2019-2033)”, January 20, 2019, http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2019/201901/201905/t20190503_6288226.htm.
  23. Bohorquez, John J (2021). China’s Little-known Efforts to Protect Its Marine Ecosystems Safeguard Some Habitats but Omit Others.Science Advances (07),1-14.
  24. Shidore,Sarang. “The China-Philippines South China Sea Face-Off Requires Restraint”, The Diplomat, December 22, 2023, https://thediplomat.com/2023/12/the-china-philippines-south-china-sea-face-off-requires-restraint/.
  25. Jervis, Robert (2017). The Logic of Images in International Relations. Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press, 29.
  26. Schelling, Thomas C. (2017). Arms and Influence. Shanghai: The Shanghai People’s Press, 99-106.

Zheng, Z. An Analysis of the Philippine-U.S. Game on Natural Resources and Ecology Issues in the South China Sea and the Trends of Arbitration Weaponization. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2025, 2 (6), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250832.

Subscribe Your Manuscript