Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
Article

The Rise of the Global South and UN Reform: How Emerging Powers Reshape Multilateralism


Weimin Ye1,*

School of International Economics, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing, China
Correspondence: Weimin Ye, E-mail: yeweimin0628@gmail.com
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2025, 2(6), 74-95; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250843
Received : 08 Sep 2025 / Revised : 17 Sep 2025 / Accepted : 24 Sep 2025 / Published : 25 Sep 2025
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite
Abstract
 
The post-World War II international order confronts unprecedented challenges as emerging economies from the Global South gain economic and political influence, creating pressure for structural reforms within the United Nations system. This research examines how emerging powers reshape multilateralism through demands for institutional changes that better reflect contemporary power realities. Using a theoretical framework combining power transition theory with institutional adaptation models, the study analyzes the material foundations of the Global South’s rise, investigates specific institutional demands regarding the Security Council, financial mechanisms, and agenda-setting processes, and identifies structural and internal barriers to reform. Case studies of the Paris Climate Agreement, BRICS expansion, and Security Council reform deadlock demonstrate differentiated reform prospects across governance domains. The research proposes a Global South Coordination Mechanism to enhance collective influence in the short term and a “weighted multilateralism” model for long-term institutional transformation. The findings reveal how emerging powers are creating a more pluralistic governance landscape through multiple pathways of contestation, adaptation, and innovation despite formidable constraints on comprehensive reform.
 
Keywords: Global South, United Nations Reform, Multilateralism, Institutional Adaptation
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2016). The End of American World Order. Polity Press.
  2. Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271-285.
  3. Alene, N. M., Ali, M. S., & Tadesse, K. Y. (2023). Africa’s quest for reform of the united nations security council: a just cause curbed by unrealistic proposals. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 23(1).
  4. Chowdhry, G., & Nair, S. (Eds.). (2014). Power, postcolonialism and international relations: Reading race, gender and class. Routledge.
  5. Cox, R. W. (2012). Production, power, and world order: Social forces in the making of history. Columbia University Press.
  6. Duggan, N., Hooijmaaijers, B., Rewizorski, M., & Arapova, E. (2021). Introduction: ‘The BRICS, Global Governance, and Challenges for South–South Cooperation in a Post-Western World’. International Political Science Review, 43(4), 469-480.
  7. Freddy, H. J., & Thomas, C. J. (2023). Status Competition: The BRICS’ Quest for Influence in Global Governance. China Report, 59(4), 388-401.
  8. Gaskarth, J. (2015). Rising powers, global governance and global responsibility. Global Affairs, 1(2), 187-199.
  9. Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7-23.
  10. Jupille, J., Mattli, W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Institutional choice and global commerce. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Keohane, R. O., & Morse, J. C. (2016). Counter-multilateralism. In The politics of global regulation (pp. 262-300). Princeton University Press.
  12. Lees, N. (2023). The endurance of the G77 in international relations: South–South ideology and voting at the United Nations 1970–2015. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 24(3), 310–330.
  13. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7-50.
  14. Men, H., & Yu, Y. (2024). China’s Relations with Developing-Countries in the New Era: Within the Framework of the Global South. International Review, (1), 67-94.
  15. Morse, J. C., & Keohane, R. O. (2014). Contested multilateralism. The Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 385-412.
  16. Organski, A. F. K., & Kugler, J. (1980). The war ledger. University of Chicago Press.
  17. Petrone, F. (2021). BRICS and Global Governance: Will the Grouping be able to Reform the United Nations Security Council? International Studies, 58(3), 363-379.
  18. Stuenkel, O. (2020). The Post-Western World: How Emerging Powers Are Remaking Global Order. Polity Press.
  19. Towns, A. E., & Rumelili, B. (2017). Taking the pressure: Unpacking the relation between norms, social hierarchies, and social pressures on states. European Journal of International Relations, 23(4), 756-779.
  20. Vestergaard, J., & Wade, R. H. (2015). Still in the woods: Gridlock in the IMF and the World Bank puts multilateralism at risk. Global Policy, 6(1), 1-12.

Ye, W. The Rise of the Global South and UN Reform: How Emerging Powers Reshape Multilateralism. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2025, 2 (6), 74-95. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.250843.

Subscribe Your Manuscript