Search for Articles:
Journal:
Subject:
MOSP / Journal / Journal of International Economy and Global Governance

Journal Menu

Home
Aims & Scope
Editorial Board
For Authors
Ethics & Policies
APC & Subscription
Editorial Office

Journal Browser

Vol.2 (2025) Iss. 1 / 2
Vol.1 (2024) Iss. 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8

Table of Contents

Abstract
Conflicts of Interest
Funding
References
License
Open Access
Research Articles

Entanglement Security and the Dynamic Turn of European Integration

An Peng1,*

1 Institute of International Relations, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing, China
* Correspondence: An Peng, E-mail: aanpeng1998@gmail.com
 
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2024, 1(1), 28-47; https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240112
Received : 20 Apr 2024 / Revised : 01 May 2024 / Accepted : 09 May 2024 / Published : 09 May 2024
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Download
Cite
Abstract：
 
European integration during the Cold War was designed to jointly respond to threats from Soviet socialism and the German Nazis. In the process of integration, European nation-states shape national security with national interests as the center, which means that integration is a collective foreign policy formed by bargaining among governments. Its direction is to provide a basis of trust from the low political field, and then to the high political field. At present, the EU is facing the trend of alienation of security relations, expansion of competition space and blurring of security boundaries. The EU urgently needs to strengthen its own identity, compete for new geopolitical areas, shape its internal jurisdiction through technical sovereignty, and promote European integration to a deeper level. Therefore, the driving force of EU integration has begun to shift to technical sovereignty. This study takes entanglement security as the research framework, focusing on the new driving factors of the development of European integration under the new situation.
 
Keywords: EU, Entanglement Security, Technical Sovereignty
 
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

Funding

    None.

References:

  1. Gong Yunmu. (2022) The return of the concept of sovereignty in the digital age and the EU 's digital governance. European study (03), 18-48 + 165 + 6.
  2. Feng Yiran: "Fusion of supranationalism and intergovernmentalism: EU's new defense construction initiatives and prospects", "International Security Studies", Issue 5, 2020.
  3. Fang Lexian, Di Chongguang: "New progress in EU security and defense construction: permanent structural cooperation and its meaning", "Contemporary World and Socialism", Issue 3, 2018.
  4. Li Xia, Shi Di: "Deepening of European Financial Integration", "China Finance", Issue 20, 2018.
  5. Wang Jue: "From Technocrats to Political Bureaucrats: Research on the Politicization of the European Central Bank", "Foreign Social Sciences", Issue 3, 2020.
  6. Zhong Yichen, Luo Yingjie: "Research on European Integration: New Public Management Reform in European Integration - Taking the Supranational Political Agency in the EU Judicial and Internal Affairs Fields as an Example", "European Studies", Issue 3, 2019.
  7. Cai Cuihong, Zhang Ruoyang: "The EU Digital Transformation Strategy under the Discourse of "Technological Sovereignty" and "Digital Sovereignty", International Political Studies, No. 1, 2022.
  8. Gong Yunmu: "The Return of the Concept of Sovereignty in the Digital Age and EU Digital Governance", European Studies, No. 3, 2022.
  9. Bellanova, R, Carrapico, H and Duez, D, Digital/sovereignty and European security integration: an introduction, European Security, 2022, pp337-355.
  10. Blancato, FG, The cloud sovereignty nexus: How the European Union seeks to reverse strategic dependencies in its digital ecosystem, Policy and Internet, 2023.
  11. Floridi, L. (2020). The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy & technology, 33, 369-378.
  12. Csernatoni, R, The EU's hegemonic imaginaries: from European strategic autonomy in defence to technological sovereignty, European Security, 2022, pp395-414.
  13. Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 2053951720982012.
  14. Pohle, J., & Thiel, T. (2020). Digital sovereignty. Pohle, J. & Thiel.
  15. Braud, A., Fromentoux, G., Radier, B., & Le Grand, O. (2021). The road to European digital sovereignty with Gaia-X and IDSA. IEEE network, 35(2), 4-5.
  16. Gong Yunmu: "The Return of the Concept of Sovereignty in the Digital Age and EU Digital Governance", published in "European Studies", Issue 3, 2022.
  17. Ma Guochun: "New Trends in the EU's Construction of Digital Sovereignty and Its Impact", in "Modern International Relations", Issue 6, 2022.
  18. Budnitsky, S., & Jia, L. (2018). Branding Internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance. European journal of cultural studies, 21(5), 594-613.
  19. Couture, S., & Toupin, S. (2019). What does the notion of "sovereignty" mean when referring to the digital?. New media & society, 21(10), 2305-2322.
  20. Lambach, D. (2020). The territorialization of cyberspace. International Studies Review, 22(3), 482-506.
  21. Mueller, M. L.(2020). Against sovereignty in cyberspace. International studies review, 22(4), 779-801.
  22. Emmanuel Macron, "President Macron Gives Speech on New Initiative for Europe," Élysée, 26 September 2017, https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2017/09/26/president-macron-gives-speech-on-new-initiative-foreurope.en.
  23. Jean-Claude Junker, "State of the Union 2018: The Hour of European Sovereignty," European Commission. 12 September 2018, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites /default/files/soteu2018-speech_en_0.pdf.
  24. Ursula von der Leyen, " A Union that Strives for More-My Agenda for Europe," European Commission, 14 July 2019, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files political-guidelines-next-commission_en_0.pdf.
  25. Couture, S., & Toupin, S. (2019). What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital?. New media & society, 21(10), 2305-2322.
  26. Jennyfer Chrétien, Etienne Drouard, Guillaume Buffet, et al. Guillaume Buffet, et al, "European technological sovereignty", February 15, 2022.
  27. Cheng Hongyan & Guo Xiaqing. (2020).Exploration of communication alienation caused by artificial intelligence. Research on Dialectics of Nature (09), 70-74.doi : 10.19484 / j.cnki.1000-8934.2020.09.013.
  28. Zhang Jian. (2022). EU Security Strategy : Origin, Evolution and Policy Trends. Contemporaneous International Relations (05), 1-32.
  29. Weingast, Br. (1995).The Economic-Role of Political insitutions: market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organisation, 1-31.
  30. Zheng Chunrong & Jin Xin. (2022).The background, path and challenge of EU digital sovereignty construction. Contemporary World and Socialism (02), 151-159.doi : 10.16502 / j.cnki.11-3404 / d.2022.02.013.
© The Author(s). Published by MOSP. 
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Peng, A. Entanglement Security and the Dynamic Turn of European Integration. Journal of International Economy and Global Governance 2024, 1 (1), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.12414/jiegg.240112.

Subscribe Your Manuscript
Branches
HanLin Group
澳科中文官网
Book Center
Patent Center
Services
For Authors
Book Builder
Projects
Young Mind
Beyond Expo.
About us
MOSP Team
MOAJ Team
Blog & News
Partnership
Careers
Contact
© 2021-2023 Macao Scientific Publishers ( Macao, P.R. China )
www.mospbs.com