Article

U.S. Biosecurity Policy during Trump’s Second Term under the “America First” Framework

By: Siyuan Pan*
Institute of International Relations, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing, China.
*Corresponding author
Received: 2026-07-31Accepted: 2026-08-14Published: 2026-10-10
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov. 2026, 3(3), 94-113; https://doi.org/10.58244/jiegg.263990
Abstract
This paper examines how the second Trump administration reshaped U.S. biosecurity policy under the “America First” framework and translated its priorities into military biotechnology programs. Drawing on the Copenhagen School’s securitization theory, this paper conducts a qualitative analysis of executive orders, strategic documents, departmental budget justification materials, and official program information. It also examines the Digital Biosecurity Forge (DB-FORGE), the Biological Threat Reduction Program, and selected DARPA biotechnology programs as case studies. The study finds that the administration did not establish a completely new biosecurity system. Instead, it redirected existing institutions toward domestic resilience, technological advantages, and operational relevance through organizational restructuring, specialized platforms, budget adjustments, and security reviews. This paper contributes to existing research by explaining how the securitization of biotechnology moves from policy discourse to specific program implementation. The findings also show that transparent review standards and continued international communication are essential for managing the security implications of biotechnology.
Keywords: Trump’s Second Administration; Global biosecurity governance; Biosecurity policy; Military biotechnology

Full Text

Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

Funding

None. 

References

  1. The White House. (2025, January 20). Withdrawing the United States from the World Health Organization (Executive Order). https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-the-worldhealth-organization/
  2. World Health Organization. (2025, May 21). Withdrawal of Member States: Report by the Director-General (A78/33 Add.1). https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA78/A78_33Add1-en.pdf
  3. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (n.d.). Biological Weapons Convention. https://disarmament.unoda.org/biological-weapons/
  4. U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). (2025, June). Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide, Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Estimates. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2026/budget_justification/pdfs/03_RDT_and_E/RDTE_Vol1_DARPA_MasterJustificationBook_PB_2026.pdf
  5. Liu, C. and Song, M. (2020). U.S. biodefense policy and national security. Journal of International Security Studies, 38(3), 96-126.
  6. Koblentz, G. D. (2010). Biosecurity reconsidered: Calibrating biological threats and responses. International Security, 34(4), 96-132. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2010.34.4.96
  7. Smith, F. L., III. (2014). American Biodefense: How Dangerous Ideas about Biological Weapons Shape National Security. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. https://cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801452710/american-biodefense/
  8. Vogel, K. M. (2013). Phantom Menace or Looming Danger? A New Framework for Assessing Bioweapons Threats. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/10403/phantom-menace-or-looming-danger
  9. Ding, C., Chen, F. and Zhang, Z. (2020). The biosecurity strategy and planning framework of the United States and its implications and recommendations. World Sci-Tech R&D, 42(3), 253-264. https://cdn.sciengine.com/doi/pdf/C99109DD91AF4C55A0688486834925A6
  10. Jin, J. (2016). An analysis of the U.S. global health security strategy. Journal of International Security Studies, (1).
  11. Davies, S. E. (2008). Securitizing infectious disease. International Affairs, 84(2), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00704.x
  12. Jin, J. and Wu, J. (2023). The Biden administration’s biosecurity policy and its “out-competing” biosecurity strategy toward China. Journal of International Security Studies, 41(4), 130-155.
  13. Han, F. (2025). U.S. defense biomanufacturing strategy and its impact under great-power strategic competition. Strategic Decision Research, (3), 62-84, 141-142. https://zljc.cbpt.cnki.net/portal/journal/portal/client/paper/9aa832081758a2f5299d78b21b2f1598
  14. Liu, M., Zhang, K., Yi, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2025). Progress in DARPA biotechnology projects in 2024. Military Medical Sciences, 49(10), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.7644/j.issn.1674-9960.2025.10.007
  15. Bloomfield, D., Pannu, J., Zhu, A. W., et al. (2024). AI and biosecurity: The need for governance. Science, 385(6711), 831-833. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq1977
  16. U.S. Department of State. (2025, September). America First Global Health Strategy. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/America-First-Global-Health-Strategy-Report.pdf
  17. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2025, March 27). HHS announces transformation to make America healthy again. https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-restructuring-doge.html
  18. The White House. (2025, May 5). Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research (Executive Order 14292). https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/improving-the-safety-and-security-of-biological-research/
  19. The White House. (2025, May 5). Regulatory Relief to Promote Domestic Production of Critical Medicines (Executive Order). https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/regulatory-relief-to-promote-domestic-production-of-critical-medicines/
  20. BioMADE. (2025, April 29). BioMADE announces at least $132 million investment in Minnesota demonstration-scale biomanufacturing facility. https://www.biomade.org/news/biomade-announces-mn-demo-scale-facility
  21. BioMADE. (2025, August 5). BioMADE announces $6.4 million investment to advance defense products. https://www.biomade.org/news/biomade-announces-64-million-investment-to-advance-defense-products
  22. The White House. (2025, July). America’s AI Action Plan. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf
  23. U.S. Department of Justice, National Security Division. (2025, April 8). Data Security Program. https://www.justice.gov/nsd/data-security
  24. National Institutes of Health. (2025, April 2). Implementation update: Protecting U.S. biomedical intellectual innovation (NOT-OD-25-083). https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-25-083.html
  25. National Institutes of Health. (2025, May 22). Protecting human genomic data when developing generative artificial intelligence tools and applications. https://grants.nih.gov/news-events/nih-extramural-nexus-news/2025/05/protecting-human-genomic-data-when-developing-generative-artificial-intelligence-tools-and-applications
  26. The White House. (2025, December). National Security Strategy of the United States of America. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf
  27. The White House. (2025, February 21). America First Investment Policy (Presidential Memorandum). https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/america-first-investment-policy/
  28. The White House. (2025, February 13). United States-India Joint Leaders’ Statement. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/02/united-states-india-joint-leaders-statement/
  29. The White House. (2025, October 29). The United States signs Technology Prosperity Deals with Japan and Korea. https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2025/10/the-united-states-signs-technology-prosperity-deals-with-japan-and-korea/
  30. The White House. (2018, September). National Biodefense Strategy. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Biodefense-Strategy.pdf
  31. The White House. (2022, October). National Biodefense Strategy and Implementation Plan for Countering Biological Threats, Enhancing Pandemic Preparedness, and Achieving Global Health Security. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/National-Biodefense-Strategy-and-Implementation-Plan-Final.pdf
  32. U.S. House of Representatives, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. (2024, December 4). After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2024.12.04-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT-ANS.pdf
  33. Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (2026, March). 2026 Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community. https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ATA-2026-Unclassified-Report.pdf
  34. U.S. Congress. (2025, December 18). National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (Public Law 119-60). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ60/html/PLAW-119publ60.htm
  35. The White House. (2025, November 24). Launching the Genesis Mission (Executive Order 14363). https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/11/launching-the-genesis-mission/
  36. U.S. Department of War. (2026, July 22). Department of War partners with the Genesis Mission to proliferate AI for science. https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4551998/department-of-war-partners-with-the-genesis-mission-to-proliferate-ai-for-scien/
  37. The White House. (2025, February 26). Implementing the President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Cost Efficiency Initiative (Executive Order 14222). https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/implementing-the-presidents-department-of-government-efficiency-cost-efficiency-initiative/
  38. U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). (2025, June). Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Estimates. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2026/budget_justification/pdfs/01_Operation_and_Maintenance/O_M_VOL_1_PART_1/DTRA_OP-5.pdf
  39. U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). (2025, June). Operation and Maintenance Overview, Volume 1, Part 1, Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Estimates. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2026/budget_justification/pdfs/01_Operation_and_Maintenance/O_M_VOL_1_PART_1/OM_Volume1_Part1.pdf
  40. Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
CC BY 4.0
© 2026 by author(s). Licensee MOSP, Macao, China. This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of Macao Scientific Publishers and/or the editors. Macao Scientific Publishers and/or the editors disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Cite

Reference format:

Siyuan Pan. U.S. Biosecurity Policy during Trump’s Second Term under the “America First” Framework[J]. J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov., 2026, 3(3): 94-113.
Share

Copy the link below to share this article:

Contact Us

Contact us via:

Email
Telephone
+00853-62961666(Available during working hours)
Supplementary
Submit Your Manuscript Now