Journal of International Economy and Global Governance

Open access & Peer review

JIEGG
A platform for rigorous academic research and discourse on issues pertaining to the international economy and global governance. Our goal is to foster a dynamic exchange of ideas among academics, policymakers, and practitioners. We aspire to publish cutting-edge research that not only contributes to theoretical insights but also offers practical implications for addressing pressing global challenges, such as sustainable development. Through our commitment to excellence and intellectual integrity, we seek to establ… More
Published by
Institute of International Organizations and Global Governance
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Shoujun Cui
Copyright
Open access under CC BY 4.0
ISSN
Print-ISSN: 3007-5149 | Online-ISSN: 3007-5157
indexed within
OpenAlex Crossref

2026 Vol.3 Iss.3 (6 articles)

Article

Inclusive Power? Institutional “Double Alienation” in China-ASEAN Digital Governance and the Dilemma of ASEAN Centrality

Abstract: This article develops a framework of institutional double alienation to examine how great-power strategic competition in the age of artificial intelligence reshapes the functions of regional institutions. Taking China-ASEAN digital governance as the empirical field, it argues that great powers may transform regional institutions through a strategy of systemic embedding rather than through direct institutional confrontation. Two mechanisms are identified. First, cooperation networks that are designed to facilitate c…
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov. 2026, 3(3), 4-23; https://doi.org/10.58244/jiegg.253449
Full Text Download PDF Views: 78  |  Downloads: 3
Article

The Spirit of Heqin: The Traditional Cultural Foundation of China’s “Closeness-Sincerity” Diplomatic Philosophy

Abstract: At a time when unilateralism is spreading and global challenges are intensifying, China’s traditional spirit of Heqin, refined through the “Two Integrations,”has evolved into the new-era diplomatic philosophy of “Closeness-Sincerity” infusing international relations with Eastern wisdom. From ancient inter-ethnic kinship-based political practices—such as the Han-Xiongnu “Fraternal Heqin” and the Tang-Tibetan “nephew-uncle Heqin”—to contemporary diplomatic frameworks like “Genuine commitment, Real results, Closeness…
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov. 2026, 3(3), 24-45; https://doi.org/10.58244/jiegg.263526
Full Text Download PDF Views: 46  |  Downloads: 1
Article

Service Scaling for Food Security and Poverty Alleviation: A Revitalized Agricultural Trusteeship Model from Shanxi

Abstract: Our goal is to advance agricultural mechanization and scaling, even in mountainous and hilly regions worldwide. This paper presents an innovative approach to optimizing the agricultural production trusteeship mechanism, drawing from field research in Shanxi Province. Specifically, we seek to refine and adapt China’s agricultural trusteeship model for developing countries, particularly those along the Belt and Road, in a context-sensitive manner. By strengthening food security and economic benefits, this model direc…
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov. 2026, 3(3), 46-70; https://doi.org/10.58244/jiegg.263898
Full Text Download PDF Views: 67  |  Downloads: 2
Article

Governing a Complex Partnership: ASEAN’s Mechanisms for Managing Relations with China under South China Sea Stress

Abstract: The China-Philippines dispute in the South China Sea has increasingly become a stress test for the broader trajectory of China-ASEAN relations. While existing studies often focus on crisis escalation or institutional bargaining in isolation, less attention has been paid to how a relationship can be sustained when strategic friction becomes recurrent and politically salient. This article develops a relationship maintenance under strategic friction framework and argues that China-ASEAN relations are most likely to ev…
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov. 2026, 3(3), 71-93; https://doi.org/10.58244/jiegg.263829
Full Text Download PDF Views: 49  |  Downloads: 0
Article

U.S. Biosecurity Policy during Trump’s Second Term under the “America First” Framework

Abstract: This paper examines how the second Trump administration reshaped U.S. biosecurity policy under the “America First” framework and translated its priorities into military biotechnology programs. Drawing on the Copenhagen School’s securitization theory, this paper conducts a qualitative analysis of executive orders, strategic documents, departmental budget justification materials, and official program information. It also examines the Digital Biosecurity Forge (DB-FORGE), the Biological Threat Reduction Program, and s…
J. Int. Eco. Glo. Gov. 2026, 3(3), 94-113; https://doi.org/10.58244/jiegg.263990
Full Text Download PDF Views: 72  |  Downloads: 2
Submit Your Manuscript Now